Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Long-term β interferon in MS: safe, but what effect on disability?
  1. Neil J Scolding
  1. Correspondence to Professor Neil J Scolding, University of Bristol Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol BS16 1LE, UK; n.j.scolding{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects around 2.5 million people worldwide. It costs the European economy some €9 billion annually—not least through the direct and indirect consequences of progressive disability in sufferers. MS has been known since its first description to cause such disability, notwithstanding the defining (usual) relapsing-remitting initial course. Over 80% of MS patients develop progressive disease; 40% of patients require a wheelchair within 10 years of diagnosis.

Until perhaps the last decade or so, therapeutic research has concentrated almost exclusively on immune treatments aiming to reduce relapse frequency, the explicit or implicit assumption, or hope, being that relapse prevention would reduce or limit progressive disability. In terms of the first aim, these efforts were not in vain. β interferons and glatiramer acetate both reduce relapse frequency by 20–30%, the newer oral agents fingolimod and cladribine, whose licensing appears imminent, by perhaps 50–60%, and the monoclonal antibodies natalizumab and alemtuzumab (the former already licensed) probably …

View Full Text


  • Linked articles 204123

  • Competing interests NJS has received honoraria and research support from Bayer Schering, Biogen, Serono, and Teva.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles