Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the effect of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on drivers' ability to anticipate traffic hazards. Slower anticipation of hazards has been associated with higher crash rates, but this driving skill has never been assessed after TBI.
Methods The anticipatory ability of 31 drivers with TBI and 24 age-matched uninjured controls was assessed with a validated drivers' Hazard Perception Test. The Hazard Perception Test displayed videos of genuine traffic scenes filmed from the driver's perspective, and participants had to respond as soon as they anticipated a traffic hazard in a scene. The primary dependent measure was mean response latency.
Results Participants with TBI were significantly slower to anticipate traffic hazards than controls (p<0.001). Within the TBI group, while hazard perception response times were significantly related to duration of post-traumatic amnesia (Spearman ρ=0.63; p<0.001), they were not significantly related to Glasgow Coma Scale scores (r=−0.19; p=0.33). Also, participants with a complicated mild TBI were significantly faster in anticipating traffic conflicts than participants with moderate to severe TBI (p=0.04).
Conclusions Individuals with TBI were slower to anticipate traffic hazards than age-matched uninjured controls. This finding signifies the need for hazard perception testing and training as part of driving rehabilitation after TBI.
- Brain injuries
- driving rehabilitation
- driver assessment
- fitness to drive
- hazard perception skill
- cognitive neuropsychology
- head injury
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The research reported here forms part of the doctoral thesis of the first author, to be submitted to The University of Queensland. The results of this study were also presented at the 32nd Annual Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment Conference, Sydney, Australia, 2009.
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Princess Alexandra Hospital and The University of Queensland ethics committees.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.