Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Research paper
Treatment effect of natalizumab on relapse outcomes in multiple sclerosis patients despite ongoing MRI activity
  1. David Bates1,
  2. Emmanuel Bartholomé2
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University, Newcastle on Tyne, UK
  2. 2MYDREAM (MYelin Disorders REseArch teaM), Department of Neurology, Tivoli Hospital, La Louvière, Belgium
  1. Correspondence to Professor D Bates, Department of Neurology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University, Newcastle on Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; david.bates{at}newcastle.ac.uk

Abstract

Natalizumab treatment significantly reduced the annualised relapse rate and MRI activity over 2 years compared with placebo in phase III trials when administered as monotherapy in AFFIRM or in combination with interferon β-1a (IFNβ) in SENTINEL. The post hoc analyses reported here sought to determine the effect of natalizumab treatment on relapse activity in the minority of patients who continued to show MRI activity (ie, ≥1 gadolinium enhancing (Gd+) lesions or new or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions) over 2 years in these trials. These analyses demonstrated that natalizumab treatment, both alone (AFFIRM) and in combination with IFNβ (SENTINEL), resulted in a reduced annualised relapse rate despite the presence of Gd+ lesions (p=0.004 and p=0.008, respectively) or new or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions (each p<0.0001). Thus patients treated with natalizumab show clinical benefit even in the presence of continued MRI activity. Long term clinical outcome of these patients has not been studied.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding Funding for this research was provided by Biogen Idec. Editorial support was provided by Robert Rhoades of Evince Communications and funded by Biogen Idec.

  • Competing interests DB has received honoraria for speaking and consulting from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Merck, and Teva. EB has received honoraria for speaking and consulting from Biogen Idec, Merck and Novartis. His hospital has received limited funding for clinical and research activity from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.