Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary surgery
  1. Edward H Oldfield,
  2. John A Jane Jr
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Edward H Oldfield, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, POB 800212, CDW Room 3530—Hospital Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0212, USA; eho4u{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

In recent years, endoscopic approaches to the pituitary and skull base are being used with increasing frequency for pituitary tumours and other tumours originating in the anterior skull base.

Ammirati and colleagues report the results of their meta-analysis comparing the results of the short-term outcome of pituitary surgery performed using a purely endoscopic approach versus a microscopic approach.1 They included comparison of mortality, extent of tumour removal and complications (cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, vascular complications, visual complications, diabetes insipidus, hypopituitarism and cranial nerve injury) in their analysis. They conclude that the only significant difference with these two approaches is that the incidence of vascular injury was increased with endoscopic surgery. The …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles