Article Text

Download PDFPDF
  1. Lucia Li1,
  2. Ines Violante1,
  3. Ewan Ross1,
  4. Rob Leech1,
  5. Adam Hampshire1,
  6. David Carmichael2,
  7. David Sharp1
  1. 1 Imperial College London
  2. 2 UCL


Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) non-invasively delivers weak electrical currents cranially and can modulate cognition. However, translation into clinical use is difficult unless the neural basis of its actions is understood.

Objectives To investigate the effect of tDCS on brain network activity, including its interaction with: (i) brain state; and (ii) stimulation type.

Methods 12 healthy controls underwent simultaneous functional (f) MRI-tDCS. Participants performed a speeded response task (CRT) or ‘rested’ whilst having short duration (35 s) anodal, cathodal or sham stimulation to the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), an area important for cognitive control.

Results Cognitive control requires balanced activity between two brain networks: the frontoparietal control network (FPCN) and default mode network (DMN). FPCN activity increases with externally focussed attention, whereas DMN activity increases with internally directed attention. These patterns were observed when switching between CRT and ‘rest’. rIFG stimulation enhanced the networks associated with each cognitive state e.g. increasing FPCN and decreasing DMN activity during CRT. Furthermore, changes in network activity depended on tDCS polarity: cathodal tDCS produced greater activation within the FPCN.

Conclusions Abnormal network activity is seen in disordered cognition. These results suggest that rIFG tDCS could normalise network activity and may assist cognitive rehabilitation.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.