Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in CIDP and MMN: a different long-term clinical response?
  1. Dario Cocito1,
  2. Aristide Merola1,
  3. Alberto Romagnolo1,
  4. Erdita Peci1,
  5. Antonio Toscano2,
  6. Anna Mazzeo2,
  7. Luca Gentile2,
  8. Massimo Russo2,
  9. Raffaella Fazio3,
  10. Massimiliano Filosto4,
  11. Gabriele Siciliano5,
  12. Erica Schirinzi5,
  13. Eduardo Nobile-Orazio6,
  14. Leonardo Lopiano1
  1. 1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
  2. 2 Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Anesthesiology, A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Martino”, Messina, Italy
  3. 3 Department of Neurology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
  4. 4 Neuromuscular Diseases and Neuropathies Section, University and Neurological Clinic, A.O “Spedali Civili” of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
  5. 5 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  6. 6 Department of Translational Medicine, Neurology 2, University of Milano, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dario Cocito, Department of Neuroscience University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Torino, Italy; dariococito101{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) has been recently proposed as an effective alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) treatment. The non-inferiority of SCIg over IVIg has been recently confirmed by a 4-month multicentre Italian observational study,1 where a similar efficacy was observed between the two therapies, with the SCIg showing possible advantages of stable plasmatic concentration2 and independence from hospital care. Here we report the 2-year experience of six Italian Neurological Centres, describing the long-term clinical outcomes of 66 patients (45 CIDP and 21 MMN) who were shifted from IVIg to SCIg.


All the CIDP and MMN patients treated with SCIg between 2009 and 2014 were considered, including patients with a previous documented response to IVIg (at least 6 months), and a wear-off effect between each IVIg infusion documented by a worsening of at least 1 point at the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS).

Adherence to therapy was the primary outcome measure, while quality of life and clinical predictors of long-term disability were analysed as secondary outcomes. The clinical assessments were regularly performed by means of the ONLS, the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale in eight-muscle group bilaterally, and Life Quality Index (LQI). Clinical worsening was defined as increase of ≥1 ONLS point, requiring augmentation of SCIg dose, SCIg/IVIg combination therapy, or a return to IVIg for stabilising the clinical conditions. SCIg was administered at the patient's home, as previously described,1 converting the IVIg dose to an equivalent SCIg dose (20% solution of immunoglobulin ready-to-use) delivered via a programmable infusion pump. All patients signed a written informed consent, and ethical committee approval was obtained (CEI—629 Prot. n 0010675, 25 January 2013). Statistical analyses were carried out utilising the Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney and Friedman non-parametric tests, Cox proportional hazard regression …

View Full Text