Download PDFPDF
Research paper
Management of patients with functional neurological symptoms: a single-centre randomised controlled trial
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    What is the evidence for neurological follow-up of patients with FNS?
    • Marinus Vermeulen, emeritus professor of neurology dpt of neurology Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Other Contributors:
      • Rob J de Haan, clinical epidemiologist

    We thank dr. Coebergh and colleagues for their interest in our study. We agree that(a) there are many differences between the health care systems of the UK and the Netherlands, (b) the results of our study do not apply to excluded patients, and (c) the management of new neurological symptoms, relapses of previous FNS and relevant neurological and other co-morbidities remain very important in order to prevent inappropriate re-referrals and investigations of patients. However, in the absence of sound evidence from appropriate clinical studies,we disagree with the authors’ conclusion that neurological follow-up of these patients is often beneficial.
    We wish to emphasize that in our study, firstly a neurologist established the diagnosis and briefly explained the diagnosis to the patient. Secondly, the first neurologist referred the patient to a specially trained second neurologist, who scheduled half an hour to discuss the diagnosis with the patient. This approach is clearly different from immediate referral to a GP after the diagnosis.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Neurologists have an important role in follow up of patients with functional neurological symptoms.
    • Jan A Coebergh, Neurologist St Georges Hospitals Foundation Trust and Ashford St Peter's Hospitals Foundation Trust
    • Other Contributors:
      • Mark Edwards, Professor of Neurology
      • Mahinda Yogarajah, Consultant Neurologist

    It is good to see that trials are being done to answer the critical question of how best to provide care for those patients with functional neurological symptoms (FNS). The research paper, ‘Management of patients with functional neurological symptoms: a single-centre randomised controlled trial’, by Pleizier, de Haan and Vermeulen, randomizes outpatients with functional neurological symptoms after diagnosis, to either two outpatient appointments with a neurologist, or referral back to a GP. Intriguingly, it finds no difference in outcome, that is quality of life scores, between the two groups.[1] While this study attempts to address an important question, namely the role of the neurologist in the care of patients with functional neurological disorders, we feel it has a number of problems that limit its generalizability, particularly to UK neurology practice.
    The Netherlands is a country that compared to the UK, has approximately four times as many neurologists per head of the population, and many more GPs with higher levels of job satisfaction,[2] and often have mental health nurse support in the practice itself. Neurology outpatient waiting times are shorter in the Netherlands, and in-patient neurology review happens routinely and is quicker, unlike in the UK where it may not occur at all.[3] Because of this lack of prompt neurological review in the UK, it is common for patients to receive erroneous diagnoses, often necessitating an “undiagnosis” at the eventual neu...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.