Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Examiner manoeuvres ‘sensory tricks’ in functional (psychogenic) movement disorders
  1. José Fidel Baizabal-Carvallo1,2,
  2. Joseph Jankovic1
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2University of Guanajuato, Mexico
  1. Correspondence to Dr José Fidel Baizabal-Carvallo, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Guanajuato, 20 de Enero no. 927, León, Guanajuato, México C.P. 37320; baizabaljf{at}hotmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

Sensory tricks, defined as ‘episodic and specific manoeuvres that temporarily improve dystonia in a manner that is not easily physiologically perceived as necessary to counteract the involuntary movement’, are well-recognised features of organic dystonia.1 The term ‘alleviating manoeuvres’ (AlM) has been proposed as a more appropriate term because ‘sensory trick’ suggests that only sensory input is required, and the word ‘trick’ wrongly implies that is ‘fake’.2 ‘Reverse sensory trick’ is the term used when a manoeuvre worsens dystonia, the latter can also be called ‘aggravating manoeuvres’ (AgM). AlMs are usually internally generated and rarely effective when applied by another person. However, patients with functional (psychogenic) movement disorders (FMDs) may show improvement or aggravation with stimuli applied by another person, that is, examiner manoeuvre (EM). In this study, we aimed to assess the frequency and characterise the clinical features of EMs in a large cohort of patients with FMDs.

Patients and methods

We reviewed medical records and video recordings of all cases of FMDs evaluated at Baylor College of Medicine Movement Disorders Clinic during a 2-year period. We assessed the stimuli type that improved or worsened the …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors JFB-C gathered the data, made the statistical analysis, conceptualised and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. JJ gathered the data, conceptualised and reviewed the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval This is a retrospective, observational study, but patients signed written informed consent to be videotaped and release of specific health information for research and educational purposes such as publishing in professional journals.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.