Objective This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether overnight oxymetry and early morning blood gas analysis predict nocturnal hypoventilation (NH) as reflected by night-time hypercapnia in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In addition, prevalence and clinical determinants of sleep apnoea in ALS were evaluated.
Methods In 250 patients with non-ventilated ALS, transcutaneous capnometry was performed along with polysomnography or polygraphy and early morning blood gases.
Results 123 patients were female, and 84 patients had bulbar-onset ALS. 40.0% showed NH, and an apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) >5/hour was found in 45.6%. In 22.3%, sleep apnoea and NH coincided. The obstructive apnoea index was significantly higher than the central apnoea index (p<0.0001). Both NH and sleep apnoea were significantly more common in male than in female patients. Sleep apnoea and AHI were associated with better bulbar function. Desaturation time (t<90%) and transcutaneous CO2 were negatively correlated with upright vital capacity. Early morning base excess (EMBE), bicarbonate and t<90% were independent predictors of NH. However, among 100 patients with NH, 31 were missed by t<90% >5 min and 17 were not identified when EMBE >3 mmol/L and t<90% >5 min were combined.
Conclusion In ALS, sleep apnoea is common and often accompanies NH. It is mainly obstructive, and central apnoea appears to be clinically irrelevant. Polygraphy or oxymetry alone are not sufficient to uncover NH. Combination of EMBE and t<90% may increase sensitivity, but transcutaneous capnography is strongly recommended for reliable detection of NH in patients with ALS.
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- sleep apnea
- nocturnal hypoventilation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors CH, AO, CG and MB were responsible for data collection. CG and MB re-evaluated PSG and PG recordings. MB performed the statistical analyses. MB and PY prepared and revised the manuscript. CH, MB and PY contributed to the revision of the manuscript in response to the reviewers' remarks.
Funding This study was supported by the Löwenstein Foundation, Bad Ems, Germany.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster und der Ärztekammer Westfalen-Lippe).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.