Article Text

Download PDFPDF
TM2-2 Analysis of adverse events in the management of chronic headache by occipital nerve stimulation
  1. S Miller,
  2. L Watkins,
  3. M Matharu
  1. The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK

Abstract

Objectives To analyse long-term adverse events of occipital nerve stimulation (ONS).

Design Prospective open-label observational study.

Subjects 134 patients with refractory headaches implanted between 2007–2014 in a single specialised centre.

Methods Information was collected on ONS device, implantable pulse generator (IPG) site and adverse event rates. The impact of implanter experience and the association between IPG site and adverse event rates was also explored.

Results Mean follow up was 46 months (6–108 months). A total of 139 adverse events were recorded in 75 patients (56%). A total of 59 additional surgeries were needed in 39 patients. A significant difference was seen in the rates of adverse events recorded between 2007–2010 and 2011–2014 (60.7% vs 42.6%, p=0.002). A significant reduction in ONS revision was seen over time (25.7% vs 5.9%, p=0.002). Analysis of adverse events with IPG site showed those with abdominal implants recorded higher adverse event rate that those with an IPG in the chest (65.8% vs 40.3%, p=0.004).

Conclusions In specialist centres, adverse event rates of ONS can be much lower than reported in the literature. Our results suggest implanter experience and IPG site both have an effect on adverse event rate.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.