Article Text

Download PDFPDF
P109 Experience of tunnelled vs. bolt EVDs on the intensive care unit
  1. H Asif,
  2. CL Craven,
  3. U Reddy,
  4. LD Watkins,
  5. AK Toma
  1. National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK


Objectives The placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is a common neurosurgical operation that carries great benefit in acute hydrocephalus but is not without risk. In our centre, bolt EVDs (B-EVD) are being placed in favour of tunnelled EVDs (T-EVD). The former has allowed for urgent CSF diversion in ITU. We compared EVD survival and complication rates between the two types of EVDs.

Design Single centre prospective case-cohort.

Subjects Twenty-five patients with B-EVDs and thirty-four patients with T-EVDs.

Methods Clinical notes and radiographic reports were collected before and after the placement of EVDs for patients in ITU between January 2017 and June 2018.

Results Fourteen of the 25 B-EVDs were placed on ITU, of which 2 were under stealth guidance. All 34 T-EVDs were placed in theatre. Mean time to CSF access after decision for diversion was 134 min in the B-EVD group and 227 min in the T-EVD group (p<0.05). Mean survival was 35 days for B-EVDs and 29 days for T-EVDs (p<0.05). Eight T-EVDs went onto be replaced as B-EVDs due to retraction or infection. Complications including infection, detachment or retraction were higher in the T-EVD group at 32% compared to 20% in the B-EVD group.

Conclusions Bolt EVDs have a lower frequency of complications and higher survival compared to tunnelled EVDs. Since B-EVDs require fewer resources they can be placed faster and on ITU.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.