Article Text

Download PDFPDF

103 New zealand hospital stroke service provision: a national survey
  1. Stephanie Thompson1,
  2. Jeroen Douwes2,
  3. Alan Barber3,
  4. Dominique Cadilhac4,
  5. Harry McNaughton5,
  6. John Gommans6,
  7. John Fink7,
  8. Alan Davis8,
  9. Valery Feigin9,
  10. Anna Ranta1
  1. 1Capital and Coast District Health Board and University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
  2. 2Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
  3. 3University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  4. 4Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  5. 5Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
  6. 6Hawke’s Bay Hospital, Hastings, New Zealand
  7. 7Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
  8. 8Northland DHB, Whangarei, New Zealand
  9. 9Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

Abstract

Introduction The REGIONS Care study assesses stroke care throughout New Zealand. It includes a national audit and here we present organisational survey results assessing current availability of interventions and management approaches in each hospital.

Methods All 20 District Health Boards were invited to complete a survey about patients managed per annum, care setting, and service provision. Results were grouped into rural and urban groups to assess for geographic differences.

Results All NZ hospitals managing stroke patients completed the survey. Results found that of these hospitals 92% have an acute stroke unit, 85% have a TIA pathway, but only 58% offer rapid access specialist TIA services. 100% offer thrombolysis, 92% use pre-hospital notification and rapid ED triage system, and 73% an in-hospital ‘code stroke’ alert. 50% have access to thrombectomy. Only 32% offer a dedicated inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. While 92% provide community rehabilitation, only 11% offer early supported discharge programmes. 87% routinely provide stroke patient education, but only 54% provide individualised stroke care plans at discharge. Only 28% have access to a psychologist. In-hospital stroke alerts (p=0.014), access to thrombectomy (p=0.016), access to stroke unit care (p=0.027), and routine referral to stroke foundation (p=0.049) were more common in urban areas.

Conclusion The results of this organisational survey indicates that stroke care provision has improved since the last audit in 2009, but important gaps remain. These results will help services focus on specific areas for improvement, some of which such as pre-hospital alerts should be relatively easy to address.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.