You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Cerebrovascular disease
Original research
Determinants of cerebral radiological progression in Fabry disease
  1. Simon Körver1,
  2. Maria G F Longo2,
  3. Marjana R Lima3,
  4. Carla E M Hollak1,
  5. Mohamed El Sayed1,
  6. Ivo N van Schaik4,5,
  7. Leonardo Vedolin6,
  8. Marcel G W Dijkgraaf7,
  9. Mirjam Langeveld1
  1. 1Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC—Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Institute for Patient Care, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  3. 3Department of Radiology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  4. 4Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC—Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
  5. 5Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
  6. 6Imaging Director, Diagnosticos da America SA, Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil
  7. 7Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC—Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mirjam Langeveld, Endocrinology and metabolism, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, Netherlands; m.langeveld{at}amc.uva.nl

Abstract

Background and aim It is unclear which patients with Fabry disease (FD) are at risk for progression of white matter lesions (WMLs) and brain infarctions and whether enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) changes this risk. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of ERT and clinical characteristics on progression of WMLs and infarctions on MRI in patients with FD.

Methods MRIs were assessed for WMLs (Fazekas scale), infarctions and basilar artery diameter (BAD). The effect of clinical characteristics (renal and cardiac involvement, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiac complications, BAD) and ERT on WML and infarction progression was evaluated using mixed models.

Results One hundred forty-nine patients were included (median age: 39 years, 38% men, 79% classical phenotype). Median follow-up time was 7 years (range: 0–13 years) with a median number of MRIs per patient of 5 (range: 1–14), resulting in a total of 852 scans. Variables independently associated with WML and infarction progression were age, male sex and a classical phenotype. Progression of WMLs and infarctions was not affected by adding ERT to the model, neither for the whole group, nor for early treated patients. Progression was highly variable among patients which could not be explained by other known variables such as hypertension, cholesterol, atrial fibrillation and changes in kidney function, left ventricular mass or BAD.

Conclusion Progression of WMLs and cerebral infarctions in FD is mainly related to age, sex and phenotype. Additional effects of established cardiovascular risk factors, organ involvement and treatment with ERT are probably small to negligible.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322268

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    Fabry disease (FD; OMIM 301500) is a rare X-inherited lysosomal storage disorder. A mutation in the GLA gene leads to a deficiency of α-galactosidase A activity (enzyme commission no. 3.2.1.22). This results in accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and related compounds in various cell types throughout the body, leading to cellular damage and loss of function of especially the kidney, heart and brain.1 Male or female sex is an important predictor of disease severity in FD, with a higher complication rate in men.2 Phenotypically, patients can be classified as having classical or non-classical disease, with a more attenuated disease course in non-classical patients.2

    Recommended follow-up of patients with FD includes routine brain MRIs.3 Commonly detected cerebral manifestations of FD on structural MRIs are white matter lesions (WMLs),4 (lacunar) infarctions5 and an increased basilar artery diameter (BAD).6 WMLs and silent infarctions have been related to cognitive decline, clinical stroke risk and early death in the general population.7 8 The consequences of WMLs and brain infarctions are less clear in FD, but there are indications that WMLs are related to cognitive impairment and clinical stroke.4 9

    Until recently, the only available specific treatment for FD was enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). The effect of ERT on cerebral manifestations, assessed by MRI, is unclear. Studies report contrasting results,10–13 most likely due to small sample sizes, short follow-up duration and lack of stratification for phenotype in most studies. Moreover, while factors like hypertension, decreased renal function and atrial fibrillation (AF) have been related to WMLs and infarctions in the general population,14–16 little is known about the effect of these factors on cerebral manifestations of FD. Determining which patients are at risk for progression of cerebral disease, establishing the importance of potentially modifiable risk factors and determining the effect of ERT could support patient management.

    The aim of this study was twofold: 1) to describe WML, BAD and infarction progression in FD and 2) to investigate the effect of clinical characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors and ERT on the progression of WMLs and infarctions in a large retrospective cohort study conducted at a reference centre for FD.

    Methods

    Study design and data collection

    The Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location Academic Medical Center) is the national referral centre for patients with FD in the Netherlands. Follow-up at the outpatient clinic depends on disease phenotype and treatment status and ranges from half yearly to once every 2 years. It includes blood tests (kidney function and plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (lysoGb3)) and MRIs (cardiac and brain). Clinical follow-up data are collected in a local database after patients provide written informed consent. Data on patients with a definite FD diagnosis and ≥1 MRI scan of the brain on a 3T scanner were extracted from the database for this retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

    According to Dutch law, no approval of the study protocol was needed as this is a retrospective study and patients were not subjected to procedures or rules of behaviour additionally to regular clinical follow-up. Patient records were de-identified prior to analysis.17

    In addition to the methods described below, please see online supplementary methods for more detailed information on phenotypic classification, data collection, demographics, cardiac complications and statistical methods.

    Supplemental material

    Diagnosis, phenotype, benign variants and genetic variants of unknown significance

    A diagnosis FD was made if: 1) a pathogenic mutation in the GLA gene was present (men and women) and 2) α-galactosidase A activity was decreased in leucocytes (men). Pathogenicity of the mutation was supported by: typical FD symptoms (Fabry-specific neuropathic pain, angiokeratoma and/or cornea verticillata in the patient or a family member), increased lysoGb3 levels, biopsy of an affected organ with typical zebra body inclusions, the mutation being described as pathogenic in literature and/or (more recently) presence of decreased T1 values on cardiac MRI. All patients were classified as having classical or non-classical disease based on strictly defined criteria.2 18 19

    The following genetic variants were regarded as benign and subjects carrying these variants were not included in this study: p.A143T, p.D313Y, p.R118C.2 Subjects with the variants p.L106F (n=1) and p.P60L (n=7) were excluded since we were unsure about the pathogenicity of these variants.20 21

    Imaging protocol and assessment procedure

    All MRI data were obtained using 3T scanners. Scans before October 2012 were made on the Intera system (Philips Intera, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) and scans after October 2012 on the Ingenia system (Philips Ingenia, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). A change in scan acquisition parameters occurred simultaneously with the switch in MRI systems (online supplementary table 1). Scans were assessed by two neuroradiologists (MRL and MGFL), MRL assessed the BAD and MGFL assessed WMLs and infarctions. All identifying data (eg, age, sex, scan date) were removed from the MRI scans and both neuroradiologists were also blinded for scan order (baseline or follow-up).

    MRI brain assessment

    White matter lesions

    WMLs were defined as hyperintensities on axial T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-weighted (FLAIR-weighted) imaging without cavitation.22 WMLs were visually assessed using both the Fazekas scale23 and the Scheltens scale24 (online supplementary table 2). The Fazekas scale rates WMLs in two locations: periventricular and deep. Severity is rated per location from 0 (no WMLs) to 3 (severe confluent WMLs), resulting in a total score between 0 and 6.

    The Scheltens scale is semi-quantitative and provides regional information for both periventricular and deep WMLs. Periventricular WMLs are rated in three regions resulting in a score from 0 (no WMLs) to 6 (severe periventricular lesions) and deep WMLs are rated in four regions resulting in a score from 0 (no WMLs) to 24 (severe deep lesions), with the total score ranging from 0 to 30.25

    Infarctions

    Infarctions were defined as focal lesions ≥3 mm, with an irregular hyperintense rim and central cavitation on axial T2-weighted and FLAIR-weighted imaging22 and were scored as present or absent.

    Basilar artery

    The BAD was assessed on both axial T2 images and Multiple Overlapping Thin Slab Acquisition (MOTSA) images (high-resolution cross-sectional MRA image of vessels) and was calculated as the average of three measures (caudal, intermediate and rostral) in mm (online supplementary methods: basilar artery diameter).6 12 26

    Disease characteristics and treatment data

    To assess the effect of patient characteristics and ERT on MRI brain parameters, we combined the scans with clinical data obtained at a nearby time point (with a maximum of 1 year time difference). If a patient experienced a clinical event (eg, AF, kidney transplantation), the time up to the event was classified as ‘event-free time’ and time after the event was classified as ‘postevent time’. Cardiovascular risk factors and cholesterol levels were assessed once, either before or during follow-up.

    Renal function was evaluated by calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).27 Left ventricular mass index (LVMi) was measured on cardiac MRI.28

    Years treated with ERT were calculated. Inhibitory antidrug antibodies to ERT (from here on referred to as antibodies) were rated as positive (inhibitory titre ≥6) or negative (inhibitory titre <6).2 29 If the antibody response was transient it was classified as negative. LysoGb3 levels at diagnosis were measured in plasma using tandem mass spectrometry.2

    Hypertension was defined as two outpatient blood pressure measurements with a systolic pressure of >140 mm Hg and/or diastolic pressure of >90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medication. Clinical cerebrovascular complications were defined as a stroke or TIA diagnosed by a neurologist.

    Data on cardiac complications were gathered by one of the authors (MES) by reviewing all patient charts, clinical letters, echocardiography and/or cardiac MRIs from birth until January 2019, extracting predefined cardiac complications (online supplementary table 3). For this study, we extracted data on AF, ischaemic heart disease, valve dysfunction, systolic dysfunction and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO).

    Statistical methods

    Data are presented as median and range or mean±SD where appropriate. R (V.3.5.1) was used for statistical analyses.30

    The intrarater reliability of the Fazekas scale, Scheltens scale and presence, absence of infarctions and BAD measurements were assessed using Kendalls coefficient of concordance (W) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)31 in a randomly selected subsample of 30 reassessed scans.

    Cumulative logistic mixed effect models (which preserve the ordinal nature of the data, package: ordinal; clmm232) were used to evaluate the importance of variables on the progression risk of WMLs (Fazekas score) and the progression risk of infarctions on MRI (absence or presence). A random patient effect was introduced into all mixed models to account for interpatient differences. The following variables were regarded as potentially important in relation to the risk of progression of both the WMLs and infarctions: age, sex, phenotype, years on ERT, eGFR, LVMi, hypertension, BAD, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, AF, ischaemic heart disease and the MRI system used. The following variables were assumed to influence the progression risk of infarctions only: valve dysfunction, systolic dysfunction, LVOTO and Fazekas score.

    Variables included were identified through a combination of potential importance in the literature (FD or general population), availability in our local database and aetiological plausibility. We created a baseline model for progression of both the WMLs and infarctions that included age, sex and phenotype as fixed effects, since we expected these to be most important for progression. The other variables of interest (eg, hypertension, eGFR) were tested for relevance by adding these to the baseline model (online supplementary table 4). Due to the exploratory nature of this study we tested many hypotheses. To reduce the false positive rate (type I errors), we regarded p values<0.01 as significant.

    Missing data of independent variables were assessed after data were matched to the cerebral MRI scans. If data were missing for <5% of the matched cerebral MRIs, this was assumed to have little influence on the analysis outcome. In case more data were missing, multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute the missing data (package: mice).33

    Results

    Patient characteristics

    A total of 149 patients with FD was included (79.2% with a classical phenotype, 37.6% men) with a median age of 38.8 years (range: 9.1–72.3 years) (table 1). Eighty-eight patients (59.1%) were treated with ERT at any time during follow-up.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Patient characteristics

    Fourteen patients developed AF during follow-up, resulting in a total of 20 patients with a history of AF (13.4%) (online supplementary table 5).

    Supplemental material

    In addition to the results below, please see online supplementary results for more detailed information on: intrarater reliability, relation between basilar artery diameter on MOTSA and T2-weighted imaging and adjustment of variables for mixed models.

    Intrarater reliability

    Intrarater reliability was excellent for the Fazekas scale (W: 0.95), Scheltens scale (W: 0.97), infarctions (W: 1.00) and BAD (ICC: 0.96).

    Brain MRIs and involvement

    During a median follow-up of 7.0 years (range: 0.0–13.1 years), patients were scanned a median of 5 times (range: 1–14) resulting in a total of 852 scans (table 2). Infarctions on MRI were present in 23 patients (15.6%) at baseline and in 42 patients (28.2%) at the end of follow-up. The median BAD was 3.33 mm (range: 1.85–5.83 mm) at baseline and increased to 3.67 mm (range: 1.85–7.25 mm) at follow-up.

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Number of scans and brain involvement at first MRI and last MRI

    Both WML severity and BAD progressed with age, with differences in rate of progression between the sex and phenotype divided subgroups (figures 1 and 2). Infarction rate was highest in men with a classical phenotype, with a median infarction-free survival of 46.5 years (figure 3).

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Relation between the Scheltens score (white matter lesion severity) and age. Grey lines and black lines represent patients with a classical phenotype and non-classical phenotype, respectively. Continuous lines represent men and dotted lines represent women. Individual patient’s Scheltens scores were fitted using a linear mixed model.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Relation between the basilar artery diameter and age. Grey lines and black lines represent patients with a classical phenotype and non-classical phenotype, respectively. Continuous lines represent men and dotted lines represent women. Individual patient’s basilar artery diameters were fitted using a linear mixed model.

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Infarction-free survival stratified for sex and phenotype. Grey lines and black lines represent patients with a classical phenotype and non-classical phenotype, respectively. Continuous lines represent men and dotted lines represent women. Shaded areas represent the 95% CIs; | indicates censoring. Age was defined as age at first infarction present on MRI. If no infarction was present, patients were censored at the end of follow-up time (at the last MRI).

    Variables related to white matter lesion and infarction progression risk

    Adjusted variables

    We adjusted four variables for the mixed models. First, in 40 scans (4.7%) the BAD was measured in two instead of three slices, mostly because of severe caudal tortuosity. There was no significant effect of the number of slices on BAD (β: −0.09; 95% CI: −0.23 to 0.04, p=0.18), so we included BAD measurements irrespective of the number of slices. Second, the only variable with data missing for ≥5% was LVMi measured with cardiac MRI (online supplementary table 6) and multiple imputation was used to impute these missing data (online supplementary figure 1). Third, we combined Fazekas score 5 and 6 to improve power, since these scores were relatively rare. Lastly, years treated with ERT correlated strongly with the variable age (r=0.88; 95% CI 0.87 to 0.91; p≤0.0001), increasing the risk of invalid results due to collinearity. Therefore, we analysed the effect of treatment with ERT both as a continuous variable (years treated) and as a binary variable. In this study, some patients were started on ERT just before their MRI, while it is known that biomarkers decrease gradually over the 6 months to 1 year after the start of ERT.34 Therefore, we classified ‘untreated’ as no ERT or a treatment duration <6 months and ‘treated’ as ≥6 months of treatment.

    Supplemental material

    Relation of variables to progression risk

    Age, sex and phenotype

    Variables independently related to the Fazekas score progression risk were a classical FD phenotype (OR: 52.9; 95% CI 11.0 to 254.8; p<0.0001), male sex (OR: 7.4; 95% CI 2.4 to 23.2; p<0.0006) and age (OR per 1 year increase: 1.3; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.3; p<0.0001) (table 3). Variables independently related to infarction progression risk were male sex (OR: 169; 95% CI 17 to 1697; p<0.0001) and age (OR 1-year increase: 1.3; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.4; p<0.0001) (table 3). Risk of progression of both infarctions and the Fazekas score was increased in men with classical disease compared with the other sex and phenotype divided subgroups. Men and women with non-classical disease had a decreased risk of progression of the Fazekas score compared with men and women with classical disease. Although age, sex and phenotype explained differences in progression risk of both the Fazekas score and infarctions, highly variable ‘random effects’ per patient remained present (online supplementary figure 2-3).

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Mixed models assessing the relation between variables and progression risk of the Fazekas score and infarctions

    Enzyme replacement therapy

    The random effects per patient were not explained by adding the treatment with ERT (<6 months vs ≥6 months) to the model (table 3). When including ‘treatment in years’ the model did not converge for both WMLs and infarction progression, probably due to collinearity of age and years treated. Removing the factor age resulted in a strong positive relation between years treated and progression, but the effect of age could not be separated of the ERT effect in this analysis.

    We also found no significant interaction between an ‘early’ treatment start (<30 years) and treatment with ERT (online supplementary table 7), meaning that we did not find a difference in treatment effect in ‘early’ treated patients compared with patients treated at older age.

    Of note, in contrast to recent findings,12 we found no relation between treatment with ERT and BAD progression.

    Disease characteristics

    Fazekas score and infarction progression risks were not related to changes in eGFR, changes in BAD, changes in LVMi, presence of hypertension, level of LDL-cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease or a history of AF (table 3). Additionally, the risk of infarction progression was not related to valve dysfunction, systolic dysfunction or LVOTO. Increasing Fazekas scores were related to a higher risk of infarction progression (OR per point increase: 1.94; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.85, p<0.0008).

    The change in MRI system and simultaneous change in scan acquisition parameters influenced Fazekas score progression risk (Intera system; OR: 2.36; 95% CI 1.56 to 3.57). Age, sex and phenotype remained independently associated with Fazekas score progression risk when including the system type to the model.

    In explorative analyses trying to explain the progression in men with classical disease, we found that higher Fazekas score progression risks were related to higher baseline lysoGb3 levels and to the presence of a nonsense/frameshift mutation but not to changes in BAD (online supplementary table 7).

    Suggested follow-up frequency

    Since age, sex and phenotype are the main variables related to progression, scan frequency should be adjusted for each patient group (suggested follow-up in online supplementary table 8).

    Discussion

    In this study, a large cohort of patients with FD with a known disease phenotype was followed for a median of 7 years, providing a unique dataset of >850 brain MRIs. Our analyses showed major differences in risk of progression of WMLs and infarctions in different patient groups, with a high progression rate from an early age in men with classical disease, while women with non-classical disease had very limited cerebral disease manifestations. Also, despite treatment with ERT, both WMLs and infarctions progressed. Progression was not related to differences in vascular risk factors (hypertension, LDL-cholesterol) or FD organ involvement (changes in eGFR, LVMi, BAD, AF and other cardiac complications).

    Evaluating the effect of ERT in non-randomised and uncontrolled studies warrants further discussion. Because no similar untreated cohort is studied, it is still possible that the progression rate is changed by ERT. While most FD studies evaluating the effect of ERT on WMLs have found no benefits in complete group analyses,4 10 11 it has been suggested that ERT might stabilise WMLs and prevent stroke in ‘early’ treated patients.10 35 In the current study, after correction for age, sex and phenotype, we found no relation between ERT, and WML or infarction progression, even in our ‘early’ treated patients. We were not able to assess the effect of very early treatment initiation (eg, before the age of 16) as these patients were underrepresented in the current study.

    Previous studies in FD have shown a strong progression of the WML burden starting from the fourth decade of life,4 36 which was also seen in our cohort (figure 1). While WMLs are also prevalent in the general population, progression in FD starts at an earlier age and the burden is higher: in our cohort, ~15% of patients had a periventricular and deep Fazekas score ≥2 at a median age of 39 years, a WML incidence and severity observed in the general population three decades later.37 Similarly, radiological infarctions were present in 15% of our cohort at baseline increasing to 28% during 7 years of follow-up, while the prevalence of (silent) brain infarctions in the general population at 40 years would be <5%, increasing to 15% two to three decades later.8

    The risk of WML and infarction progression was not equally distributed: subgroups divided by sex and phenotype showed large differences in risk of progression in our study, this differentiation was not addressed in previous studies. The limited WML severity and the low number of infarctions in women with non-classical disease suggests that there may not be an increased risk of these complications in this patient group compared with the general population.8 37 These findings may have implications for future FD drug studies. If sex and phenotype are not equally distributed between the treated and control groups, this can lead to erroneous conclusions regarding treatment effectiveness.

    No modifiable risk factors for progression of WMLs and infarctions were found in this study. Neither vascular risk factors nor cardiac or renal disease was related to progression of WMLs or infarctions. This is in line with previous findings on WMLs4 11 36 and infarctions on MRI.5 Since the effects of most of these factors on progression are probably negligible to small, enormous sample sizes would be required to demonstrate any additional effects after taking the effects of age, sex and phenotype into account. Another possible explanation for differences in progression could be additional subtle differences in disease severity within the phenotypes, reflected by the relation between WML progression and lysoGb3 levels and mutation type in men with classical disease in this study.

    This study has several strengths and limitations. The combination of the large dataset, long follow-up and clinical data-matching to all separate scans, in combination with the use of mixed models improved power and maximised data use.

    The study was limited by the use of MRIs with changes in acquisition parameters, which probably affected assessment of WML progression. Nevertheless, the relation to age, sex and phenotype did not change with the switch in acquisition parameters, indicating decent reliability of the use of WML rating scales in these circumstances. Second, the sensitivity of the Fazekas and Scheltens scale for progression of WMLs is variable and volumetric measurement of the white matter lesion load is seen as the golden standard.38 39 We choose assessment with visual semi-quantitative scales since these are fast, easy to use, allowed full anonymisation and have been broadly applied in earlier studies. This study shows that the use of these scales is feasible in studies with long-term follow-up with changing scan parameters. Third, one neuroradiologist assessed the BAD while the other neuroradiologist assessed all other pathology. While intrarater reliability was excellent, we were not able to assess the inter-rater reliability. Lastly, evaluating the effect of ERT in cohort studies is difficult, and might result in erroneous conclusions. There is a strong indication bias: severely affected patients are more likely to be treated. Moreover, the use of the number of years on treatment is complicated due to collinearity with age. The latter cannot be excluded from analyses since it is the one of the most important factors in relation to progression.

    To conclude, progression of cerebrovascular involvement in FD, regardless of ERT status, is to be expected with increasing age, especially in men with classical disease. This should be clearly communicated to patients. Surprisingly, cardiovascular risk factors were not related to the progression of WMLs and brain infarctions. While these factors should be managed rigorously, the effects of this management should not be overestimated and future studies should evaluate the effect of genetic modifiers and accurate measures of residual enzyme activity on progression of infarctions and WMLs (table 4). Trials evaluating new treatment modalities for FD should incorporate brain MRIs, since the effect of current treatment on cerebral manifestations is clearly insufficient. With multiple newly emerging treatment strategies for FD, longitudinal data collection in large, international, industry-independent registries are needed to facilitate comparison of effectiveness. However, infarctions on MRI or WMLs measured using the Fazekas scale as clinical end points require unrealistic large sample sizes and follow-up duration (see online supplementary figure 4-5 for trial sample size calculations). Diffusion-weighted and quantitative imaging of the brain40 should be longitudinally explored, as there is a clear need for validated surrogate markers for the occurrence of cerebral infarctions in FD.

    View this table:
    Table 4

    Main findings, recommendations and future research directions

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Zarate YA,
      2. Hopkin RJ
      . Fabry's disease. The Lancet 2008;372:1427–35.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61589-5pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18940466
      OpenUrlPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Arends M,
      2. Wanner C,
      3. Hughes D, et al
      . Characterization of classical and nonclassical Fabry disease: a multicenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28:1631–41.doi:10.1681/ASN.2016090964pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27979989
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Ortiz A,
      2. Germain DP,
      3. Desnick RJ, et al
      . Fabry disease revisited: management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol Genet Metab 2018;123:416–27.doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530533
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Körver S,
      2. Vergouwe M,
      3. Hollak CEM, et al
      . Development and clinical consequences of white matter lesions in Fabry disease: a systematic review. Mol Genet Metab 2018;125:205–16.doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.08.014pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30213639
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Buechner S,
      2. Moretti M,
      3. Burlina AP, et al
      . Central nervous system involvement in Anderson-Fabry disease: a clinical and MRI retrospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:1249–54.doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.143693pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18535022
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Manara R,
      2. Carlier RY,
      3. Righetto S, et al
      . Basilar artery changes in Fabry disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:531–6.doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5069pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126747
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Debette S,
      2. Markus HS
      . The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;341:c3666–c66.doi:10.1136/bmj.c3666pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20660506
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Vermeer SE,
      2. Longstreth WT,
      3. Koudstaal PJ
      . Silent brain infarcts: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:611–9.doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70170-9pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17582361
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Körver S,
      2. Geurtsen GJ,
      3. Hollak CEM, et al
      . Predictors of objective cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive complaints in patients with Fabry disease. Sci Rep 2019;9:188. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37320-0pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655570
      OpenUrlPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Fellgiebel A,
      2. Gartenschläger M,
      3. Wildberger K, et al
      . Enzyme replacement therapy stabilized white matter lesion progression in Fabry disease. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;38:448–56.doi:10.1159/000369293pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25502511
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Stefaniak JD,
      2. Parkes LM,
      3. Parry-Jones AR, et al
      . Enzyme replacement therapy and white matter hyperintensity progression in Fabry disease. Neurology 2018;91:e1413–22.doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000006316pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30209238
      OpenUrlPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Miwa K,
      2. Yagita Y,
      3. Sakaguchi M, et al
      . Effect of enzyme replacement therapy on basilar artery diameter in male patients with Fabry disease. Stroke 2019;50:1010–2.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024426pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30852964
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Uçeyler N,
      2. Homola GA,
      3. Guerrero González H, et al
      . Increased arterial diameters in the posterior cerebral circulation in men with Fabry disease. PLoS One 2014;9:e87054–e54.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087054pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24475221
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Kalantarian S,
      2. Ay H,
      3. Gollub RL, et al
      . Association between atrial fibrillation and silent cerebral infarctions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:650–8.doi:10.7326/M14-0538pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25364886
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Lee M,
      2. Saver JL,
      3. Chang K-H, et al
      . Low glomerular filtration rate and risk of stroke: meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;341:c4249. doi:10.1136/bmj.c4249pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20884696
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      1. Verhaaren BFJ,
      2. Vernooij MW,
      3. de Boer R, et al
      . High blood pressure and cerebral white matter lesion progression in the general population. Hypertension 2013;61:1354–9.doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00430pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23529163
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki
      . Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama 2013;310:2191–4.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. van der Tol L,
      2. Cassiman D,
      3. Houge G, et al
      . Uncertain diagnosis of Fabry disease in patients with neuropathic pain, angiokeratoma or cornea verticillata: consensus on the approach to diagnosis and follow-up. JIMD Rep 2014;17:83–90.doi:10.1007/8904_2014_342pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25224312
      OpenUrlPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Smid BE,
      2. van der Tol L,
      3. Cecchi F, et al
      . Uncertain diagnosis of Fabry disease: consensus recommendation on diagnosis in adults with left ventricular hypertrophy and genetic variants of unknown significance. Int J Cardiol 2014;177:400–8.doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.001pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25442977
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Smid BE,
      2. van der Tol L,
      3. Biegstraaten M, et al
      . Plasma globotriaosylsphingosine in relation to phenotypes of Fabry disease. J Med Genet 2015;52:262–8.doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102872pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25596309
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. Smid BE,
      2. Hollak CEM,
      3. Poorthuis BJHM, et al
      . Diagnostic dilemmas in Fabry disease: a case series study on Gla mutations of unknown clinical significance. Clin Genet 2015;88:161–6.doi:10.1111/cge.12449pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25040344
      OpenUrlPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Wardlaw JM,
      2. Smith EE,
      3. Biessels GJ, et al
      . Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:822–38.doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23867200
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    23. ↵
      1. Fazekas F,
      2. Chawluk JB,
      3. Alavi A, et al
      . Mr signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351–6.doi:10.2214/ajr.149.2.351pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3496763
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      1. Scheltens P,
      2. Barkhof F,
      3. Leys D, et al
      . A semiquantative rating scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Sci 1993;114:7–12.doi:10.1016/0022-510X(93)90041-Vpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8433101
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. Prins ND,
      2. van Straaten ECW,
      3. van Dijk EJ, et al
      . Measuring progression of cerebral white matter lesions on MRI: visual rating and volumetrics. Neurology 2004;62:1533–9.doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000123264.40498.b6pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15136677
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Parker DL,
      2. Yuan C,
      3. Blatter DD
      . Mr angiography by multiple thin slab 3D acquisition. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:434–51.doi:10.1002/mrm.1910170215pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2062215
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)
      . Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. In: Kidney international supplements. CKD Work Group, 2013: 1–150.
    28. ↵
      1. Myerson SG,
      2. Bellenger NG,
      3. Pennell DJ
      . Assessment of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Hypertension 2002;39:750–5.doi:10.1161/hy0302.104674pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11897757
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. ↵
      1. Linthorst GE,
      2. Hollak CEM,
      3. Donker-Koopman WE, et al
      . Enzyme therapy for Fabry disease: neutralizing antibodies toward agalsidase alpha and beta. Kidney Int 2004;66:1589–95.doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00924.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15458455
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    30. ↵
      1. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [program]
      . 3.5.1 version. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018.
    31. ↵
      1. Koo TK,
      2. Li MY
      . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–63.doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27330520
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Christensen RHB
      . A tutorial on fitting cumulative link mixed models with clmm2 from the ordinal package. 2019.
    33. ↵
      1. Buuren Svan,
      2. Groothuis-Oudshoorn K
      . mice : Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. J Stat Softw 2011;45:2011. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03
    34. ↵
      1. Arends M,
      2. Biegstraaten M,
      3. Wanner C, et al
      . Agalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta for the treatment of Fabry disease: an international cohort study. J Med Genet 2018;55:351–8.doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104863pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29437868
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. ↵
      1. El Dib R,
      2. Gomaa H,
      3. Ortiz A, et al
      . Enzyme replacement therapy for Anderson-Fabry disease: a complementary overview of a Cochrane publication through a linear regression and a pooled analysis of proportions from cohort studies. PLoS One 2017;12:e0173358. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173358pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28296917
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Rost NS,
      2. Cloonan L,
      3. Kanakis AS, et al
      . Determinants of white matter hyperintensity burden in patients with Fabry disease. Neurology 2016;86:1880–6.doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002673pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27164662
      OpenUrlPubMed
    37. ↵
      1. Smith EE,
      2. Saposnik G,
      3. Biessels GJ, et al
      . Prevention of stroke in patients with silent cerebrovascular disease: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart Association/American stroke association. Stroke 2017;48:e44–71.doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000116pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980126
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    38. ↵
      1. Gouw AA,
      2. van der Flier WM,
      3. van Straaten ECW, et al
      . Reliability and sensitivity of visual scales versus volumetry for evaluating white matter hyperintensity progression. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;25:247–53.doi:10.1159/000113863pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18216467
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    39. ↵
      1. van den Heuvel DMJ,
      2. ten Dam VH,
      3. de Craen AJM, et al
      . Measuring longitudinal white matter changes: comparison of a visual rating scale with a volumetric measurement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:875–8.pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16611781
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    40. ↵
      1. Cocozza S,
      2. Russo C,
      3. Pontillo G, et al
      . Neuroimaging in Fabry disease: current knowledge and future directions. Insights Imaging 2018;9:1077–88.doi:10.1007/s13244-018-0664-8pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30390274
      OpenUrlPubMed

    Footnotes

    • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it appeared Online First. The license type has been corrected to CC BY.

    • Contributors SK: study design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, first draft of manuscript. MGFL: acquisition and interpretation of data, critical revision of manuscript. MRL: acquisition and interpretation of data, critical revision of manuscript. CEMH: study concept, study design, interpretation of data, study supervision, critical revision of manuscript. MES: acquisition and interpretation of data, critical revision of manuscript. IvS: interpretation of data, study supervision, critical revision of manuscript. LV: critical revision of manuscript. MGD: statistical support, critical revision of manuscript. ML: interpretation of data, study supervision, critical revision of manuscript.

    • Funding Study funded by the Academic Medical Center (innovation grant 2014).

    • Competing interests SK, MGFL, MRL, LV and MGD report no competing interests. MES is involved in premarketing studies with Idorsia. Financial arrangements are made through AMC Research BV. No fees, travel support or grants are obtained from Pharmaceutical Industry. CEMH and Mirjam Langeveld are involved in premarketing studies with Genzyme, Protalix and Idorsia. Financial arrangements are made through AMC Research BV. No fees, travel support or grants are obtained from Pharmaceutical Industry. IvS chairs a steering committee for CSL Behring and received departmental honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards for CSL Behring and Baxter. All lecturing and consulting fees for INS were donated to the Stichting Klinische Neurologie, a local foundation that supports research in the field of neurological disorders.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Ethics approval Patient records were de-identified prior to analysis. The Medical Ethics Review Committee of the AMC confirmed that the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study (W19-417 # 19.484). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of 2013.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data availability statement Data are available on reasonable request. The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available. Because of the rarity of the disease, even anonymised data can be linked to a specific individual. In case of a specific scientific question, requests to make part of the dataset available will be reviewed and seriously considered.