You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Editorial commentary
Assessing the upper motor neurone: novel UMN biomarkers are needed for clinical trials
  1. Robert D Henderson1,
  2. Matthew S Devine2
  1. 1 Department of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2 Medical Imaging Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Robert D Henderson, Department of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia 4029; robert.henderson{at}health.qld.gov.au

https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-327948

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The paper by Nitert provides a valuable contribution regarding the importance of the upper motor neuron (UMN) as a potential disease biomarker of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). There are well-described clinical findings of UMN dysfunction such as increased tone and hyperreflexia, but these can be difficult to grade; others have highlighted the importance of slowing of movements, particularly hand function. Hence, there is a disconnect between simplified clinical scoring systems and the disease itself, and we are left with no standard measurement of UMN involvement in the clinical or research setting. The short bedside scoring system described by Devine, modified from Ravits, has been used, where the decline was most notable …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • RDH and MSD contributed equally.

    • Contributors Equal contribution.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles