You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 93, Issue 11
  • Commentary on Efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive–compulsive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Editorial commentary
Commentary on Efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive–compulsive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis
  1. Jon E Grant
  1. Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jon E Grant, Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA; jgrant4{at}bsd.uchicago.edu

https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-329698

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric disorder characterised by distressing, irrational, time-consuming, obsessive thoughts and repetitive rituals. When severe, OCD tends to be chronic, often completely impairs an individual socially and occupationally, and results in a significantly reduced quality of life.1 Although pharmacotherapy (eg, serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and cognitive behavioral therapy (eg, exposure and response prevention therapy) are effective in a majority of people with OCD, a small percentage (3%–5%) of people with OCD report no benefit from available treatments and remain impaired.2

    Neurosurgery, particularly deep brain stimulation (DBS), has been used for decades in …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors The author solely wrote the commentary.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests The author has received research grants from Otsuka and Biohaven Pharmaceuticals. He receives yearly compensation from Springer Publishing for acting as Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Gambling Studies and has received royalties from Oxford University Press, American Psychiatric Publishing, Norton Press and McGraw Hill.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles