Article Text

Download PDFPDF
070 Real-world experience of perampanel monotherapy in epilepsy patients with focal-onset and generalised-onset seizures
  1. Taoufik Alsaadi1,
  2. Manuel Toledo2,
  3. Fernando Ayuga Loro3,
  4. Eugen Trinka4,
  5. Tony Wu5,
  6. Manoj Malhotra6,
  7. Leock Y Ngo6,
  8. Antonio Gil-Nagel7,
  9. Vicente Villanueva8
  1. 1Department of Neurology, American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  2. 2Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
  3. 3University Hospital of Toledo, Toledo, Spain
  4. 4Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
  5. 5Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
  6. 6Eisai Inc, USA
  7. 7Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
  8. 8Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain

Abstract

Data from 44 pooled clinical practice studies were compared for epilepsy patients with focal-onset and/or generalised-onset seizures treated with perampanel (PER) monotherapy (n=268) (first-line or conversion to monotherapy). Retention was assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months of PER treatment. Seizure freedom rates and responder rates (≥50% seizure frequency reduction), assessed by seizure type at last visit were evaluated (last observation carried forward). Adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs were evaluated. Seizure types at baseline were focal-onset only (75.0%), generalised-onset only (24.5%), and focal-onset and generalised-onset (0.5%). At 3, 6 and 12 months, retention rates were 91.1%, 87.3% and 73.3%, respectively. At last visit, seizure freedom rates in patients with focal-onset and generalised-onset seizures were 64.1% and 69.4%, respectively; corresponding responder rates were 84.4% and 93.9%, respec- tively. AEs were reported for 45.2% of patients, with the most frequent (≥10% of patients) being dizziness/vertigo (16.8%) and irritability (11.2%); 13.7% of patients discontinued due to AEs over 12 months. Psychiatric AEs were reported for 20.8% of patients. In conclusion, PER was effective and generally well-tolerated as monotherapy for focal-onset and/or generalised-onset seizures in everyday clinical practice. At last visit, approximately two-thirds of patients were seizure free.

Supported by Eisai

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.