Responses

Original research
Multidisciplinary consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Epidural blood patch for spontaneous intracranial hypotension: Comments to the published guideline
    • Kamath Sriganesh, Neuroanesthesiologist and Consultant, NIMHANS Pain Management Clinic National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India
    • Other Contributors:
      • Jitender Saini, Neuroradiologist

    Dear Editor-in-Chief,
    We read with great interest the consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). [1] In the absence of any recommendations, this guideline will help clinicians in formulating their diagnostic and management approaches for SIH. In this letter, we wish to discuss about the epidural blood patch (EBP) in the management of SIH. The role of targeted EBP for management of SIH has not been compared with non-targeted EBP in randomized controlled trials to establish superiority of one over the other. A recent systematic review of studies with 10 or more patients with SIH reported similar success with either technique. [2] However, where expertise is available and when the precise site of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is identifiable, it is prudent to consider targeted EBP as the first choice. This reduces the volume of autologous blood required, minimizes the need of reliance on gravity for spread of epidurally placed blood to the potential site of leak and decreases the procedure failure rates and need for subsequent EBPs or surgical interventions. In our center, which is a tertiary care neurosciences academic hospital, after an initial conservative management for a week, a targeted EBP is performed as the preferred approach to manage SIH. [3] If the site of leak is not determinable and if the expertise to perform cervical or thoracic EBP is not available, a non-targeted EBP may be the preferred interventi...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.