Responses

Download PDFPDF

Review
Functional neurological disorder is a feminist issue
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Feminism demands radical revision to functional neurological disorder

    In “Functional neurological disorder is a feminist issue” by McLoughlin et al.,[1] authors explain that FND patients “suffer subtle and overt forms of discrimination”, suggesting that “FND clinical services and research are chronically underfunded in line with the neglect of disorders disproportionately affecting women”. Ultimately, they insist that feminists should support “parity of esteem” for FND with other neurological conditions.

    I suggest that the idea of an alliance between feminism and FND is highly problematic. First, authors minimize the seriousness of human rights violations against women in the name of hysteria. Second, they fail to consider the role that FND plays in healthcare gender bias across specialties. Third, they perpetuate the myth that functional diagnosis rarely errs, further threatening women’s safety in the healthcare system.

    First, while authors do acknowledge “objectification and exploitation” of women diagnosed with hysteria, their concern is merely that “some sociologists and scientists have opined that the diagnosis was used as a ‘patriarchal tool’ to silence or ignore complaints of women”. There’s no mention of sexualization of women’s symptoms in the name of hysteria, even as recently as ICD-10, or the range of sexual treatments to which “hysterical” women have been subjected, including genital mutilation. There’s no acknowledgment that these treatments, like sectioning based on the wishes of husbands, fathers, or sons, are...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Functional neurological disorder - Gender, care and cost
    • Khichar Shubhakaran, Senior Professor Neurology MDM Hospital, Dr S N Medical college Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

    Functional neurological disorder is an important aspect with respect to burden and cost of management irrespective of gender as the authors have pointed out very rightly1.
    It can be chronic but most of the times present as an emergency therby increasing panic, inpatient admissions. Smooth care, workup and appropriate guidelines for the same may help a lot in such conditions.
    There is limited information, awareness, health care utilities, and economic burden of such patients which makes the situation more grim.
    So there should be multidisciplinary approach i.e. physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, and psychological assessment. Functional neurological disorders overlap with refractory neurological conditions i.e. headache, seizure, focal deficit etc., so better these patients be subdivided in these categories. Framing universal guidelines all across the world according to subdivisions with appropriate line of care as is being done in various other disorders may help a lot to smoothen improve management and help reduce the cost of therapy and gender bias.
    References-
    1. Caoimhe McLoughlin, Ingrid Hoeritzauer, Verónica Cabreira et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-330192
    2. Christopher D. Stephen, Vicki Fung, Codrin I. Lungu et al Alberto J. Espay Assessment of Emergency Department and Inpatient Use and Costs in Adult and Pediatric Functional Neur...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    A good start?

    Dear Editor,

    Whilst long overdue this paper represents a good start, to me. However it leaves me with several questions. Here are a few of them.

    

Will we see an immediate reduction in the number of ‘dustbin’ FND diagnoses, including amongst people deemed to be in the FND Subtypes? Will patients be empowered to define what a ‘dustbin’ diagnosis is?



    Do the authors believe that the FND Society will promptly appoint an equalities expert as their new Patient Engagement Executive? I am not alone in receiving a suboptimal response from them, especially when compared to their approach to FND Portal. I was happy that he got ‘rockstar’ treatment; I got ‘appalling contempt’ and what amounts to ‘we control the narrative, you’re not welcome here’ which was interpreted as their attempt to silence women. 



    Was the decision not to include patient representation in the FND Subtypes paper made by a feminist?

    Same question regarding the lumping of Conversion Disorder under FND in DSM, which has made it harder than ever for people with rare conditions such as Stiff Person Syndrome and Moyamoya Disease to record an initial misdiagnosis of Conversion Disorder.



    Is it ethical (from a feminist perspective or any other) to use the word ‘functional’ to aid acceptance of a FND diagnosis on the basis that it doesn’t overtly point to a mental disorder diagnosis?

    Can the authors assure your readers that ‘functional’ no longer means ‘hysteric...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.