Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Background Natalizumab was not shown to modify disability in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). This matched observational study compared the effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) with natalizumab in progressive MS.
Methods Patients with primary/secondary progressive MS from seven AHSCT MS centres and the MSBase registry, treated with AHSCT or natalizumab, were matched on a propensity score derived from sex, age, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), number of relapses 12/24 months before baseline, time from MS onset, the most effective prior therapy and country. The pairwise-censored groups were compared on hazards of 6-month confirmed EDSS worsening and improvement, relapses and annualised relapse rates (ARRs), using Andersen-Gill proportional hazards models and conditional negative binomial model.
Results 39 patients treated with AHSCT (37 with secondary progressive MS, mean age 37 years, EDSS 5.7, 28% with recent disability progression, ARR 0.54 during the preceding year) were matched with 65 patients treated with natalizumab. The study found no evidence for difference in hazards of confirmed EDSS worsening (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.70 to 3.14) and improvement (HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 10.29) between AHSCT and natalizumab over up to 4 years. The relapse activity was also similar while treated with AHSCT and natalizumab (ARR: mean±SD 0.08±0.28 vs 0.08±0.25; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.82). In the AHSCT group, 3 patients experienced febrile neutropenia during mobilisation, 9 patients experienced serum sickness, 6 patients required intensive care unit admission and 36 patients experienced complications after discharge. No treatment-related deaths were reported.
Conclusion This study does not support the use of AHSCT to control disability in progressive MS with advanced disability and low relapse activity.
- MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. The data are the property of the individual centres. Data from the participating cohorts can be requested from the principal investigators, at their discretion and conditional on obtaining approvals from the appropriate institutional review boards. The MSBase registry is a data processor and warehouses data from individual principal investigators who agree to share their datasets on a project-by-project basis. Data access to external parties can be granted on reasonable request at the sole discretion of the principal investigators, who will need to be approached individually for permission.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. The data are the property of the individual centres. Data from the participating cohorts can be requested from the principal investigators, at their discretion and conditional on obtaining approvals from the appropriate institutional review boards. The MSBase registry is a data processor and warehouses data from individual principal investigators who agree to share their datasets on a project-by-project basis. Data access to external parties can be granted on reasonable request at the sole discretion of the principal investigators, who will need to be approached individually for permission.
Footnotes
Contributors TK conceptualised and designed the study, recruited patients, contributed data, carried out statistical analysis, interpreted the results, drafted and edited the manuscript, and acts as the study guarantor. JM, IS, BW, MSF, HA, EK, EKH, MT, TK, JB, RM, ØT, LB, BS and JS conceptualised the study, recruited patients, contributed data, interpreted the results and edited the manuscript. SS and IR interpreted the results and edited the manuscript.
Funding This research was funded in part by the National Health and Medical Research Council (1129189, 2026836) and Multiple Sclerosis Australia (19-800). For the purposes of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Competing interests TK served on scientific advisory boards for MS International Federation and WHO, BMS, Roche, Janssen, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Merck and Biogen; steering committee for Brain Atrophy Initiative by Sanofi Genzyme; received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from WebMD Global, Eisai, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, BioCSL and Merck; and received research or educational event support from Biogen, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche, Celgene and Merck. SS has nothing to disclose. IR served on scientific advisory boards/steering committees for Novartis and Merck; and received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Biogen, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme and Merck. JM served on scientific advisory board for Roche; and received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from Novartis, Biogen, Roche and Merck. IS received compensation for an educational activity from Biogen. BW has nothing to disclose. MSF has nothing to disclose. HA has nothing to disclose. EKH received honoraria/research support from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and Teva; and has been supported by the Czech Ministry of Education–project Cooperatio LF1, research area Neuroscience and the project National Institute for Neurological Research (Programme EXCELES, ID project no LX22NPO5107)–funded by the European Union-Next Generation EU. EK has nothing to disclose. MT received honoraria from Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, AbbVie, Roche, MorphoSys and Novartis; served as an advisor to Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, AbbVie, Amgen, Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, MorphoSys and Novartis; and received conference travel support from Gilead Sciences, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Janssen and AbbVie. TK has nothing to disclose. JB has nothing to disclose. RM received compensation for travelling, conference fees and consulting fees from Merck, Teva, Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen Idec, Novartis, Roche, BMS and Celgene. OT received speaker honoraria from and served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva, Merck and Novartis. LB received speaker honoraria from Novartis, and consultant fees from Viatris. AKL did not declare any disclosures. BS has nothing to disclose. JS declares honoraria for educational events from Jazz, Gilead and Janssen; for advisory board membership from Medac and Vertex; and for trial IDMC membership from Kiadis Pharma.
Patient and public involvement statement This is a retrospective analysis of registry data. Therefore, an a priori consultation of patients and the public regarding the design of the study and use of the source data was not possible. However, AHSCT has been repeatedly identified by consumers as an intervention of high interest in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.