Introduction and aims: The aims of this study were to determine the reliability, responsiveness and minimally important change score of the MSIS-29 physical using the EDSS as an anchor measure.
Methods: 214 MS patients (EDSS 0- 8.5) had concurrent MSIS-29 and EDSS assessments at baseline and at up to four years of follow-up.
Results: Stable patients. 116 patients had unchanged EDSS scores. Stability of the MSIS-29 physical (mean change 0.1 points) was better in the 85 patients with EDSS 0 to 5.0 than in the 31 patients with EDSS 5.5 to 8.5 in whom the MSIS-29 physical score fell by eight points, a response shift phenomenon. A floor effect for the MSIS-29 was observed in 5% of stable patients at both time points. Changed Patients. 98 patients experienced EDSS change with moderately strong statistically significant correlations between change scores in the EDSS and the MSIS-29 physical (r = 0.523, p< 0.0001). Effect sizes for MSIS-29 physical change were moderate to large. Using ROC curves, the MSIS-29 change score which produced a combination of optimal sensitivity and specificity was chosen for both EDSS ranges. For EDSS range 5.5- 8, a change score of eight had a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 67%. For EDSS 0- 5.0, a change score of seven had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 51%.
Conclusions: The MSIS-29 physical performs well over time, and is suitable for use in trials; a minimal change score of eight points in the MSIS-29 is clinically significant.
- disability scales
- multiple sclerosis
- multiple sclerosis impact scale
- response shift
- self-report measures
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.