Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Who values evidence?
  1. Peter Littlejohns
  1. Correspondence to Professor Peter Littlejohns, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, King's College London, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London SE1 3QD, UK; peter.littlejohns{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

In his thoughtful ‘reality check’ on the future of healthcare Roy Moynihan lists 10 reasons to be optimistic.1 His first four developments are particularly pertinent to the concerns addressed in Smith and Wessely's paper.2 Moynihan cites the drive for an evidence informed approach as a ‘check to an overconfident medical establishment’. His second reason introduces fairness and justice and the desire to reduce the variation in healthcare—epitomised by the ‘postcode lottery’. He goes on to consider the new emphasis on patient-centred collaborative care and how the focus has shifted from the professionals who deliver the care to the people receiving it. Accompanying this trend, and often driving it, he cites the rise of consumers’, or citizens’ groups and he has a special mention for palliative care which he feels has moved away from an unhealthy emphasis on ‘heroic and unnecessary technological interventions’ in order ‘to turn to simpler forms of care that relieve suffering rather than trade in false promises or miracle cures’.

But …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles