Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Introduction
Motor neuron disease (MND) is a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders defined by a progressive upper motor neuron (UMN) and lower motor neuron (LMN) loss in a varying combination, encompassing a heterogeneous clinical spectrum depending on a different body region involvement at onset, extent and rate of motor neuron (MN) loss and disease spread. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common and severe form of MND, leading to death in approximately 4 years from symptoms onset. To date, the mainstay neuroprotective therapy is riluzole, despite its limited efficacy, while the role of edaravon is still debated. Phenotypic heterogeneity is increasingly recognised within the MND spectrum, ranging from selective UMN or LMN involvement, to classic ALS, when widespread combination of UMN and LMN dysfunction occurs.1 The clinical spectrum of MND has been further detailed with the recognition of flail arm (FA), flail leg (FL) and pure lower motor neuron (PLMN) phenotypes, considered to be restricted MND phenotypes characterised by a predominant or selective LMN disease (LMND), when UMN dysfunction is absent or marginal.1 2 Furthermore, patients with MND can show an extra-motor involvement such as cognitive impairment with the development, in approximately 10%–15% of cases, of frontotemporal dementia.
Few studies have previously focused on these LMN-restricted phenotypes, therefore, the aim of the present study is to retrospectively investigate the differentiating features of FA, FL and PLMN phenotypes in a large Italian MND cohort.
Materials and methods
2648 patients with MND were recruited in 13 Italian ALS referral centres from January 2009 to December 2013 and data collected in a common database, which was cleaned before data analysis. To highlight the distinguishing features of patients with FA, FL and PLMN, the classic and bulbar phenotypes were used as controls. The final dataset consisted of 1944 patients. ALS diagnosis was established in accordance with …
Footnotes
NR and MF are joint senior authors.
Twitter @RosannaTortelli
Contributors PS and GC: contributed to the design, conceptualisation, review of data collection and interpretation, statistical analysis and writing the first draft. AQ, NR and MF: contributed to the design, conceptualisation, statistical analysis and critical revision of the manuscript. ACalvo, YMF, CM, CL, KM, NT, CS, GS, FT, AConte, RT, MR, EZ, LP, TD, PC, FA, RF, AChio, VAS, GM, VS, PV, CC, GQ, GT, MS, GL, SM, JM contributed to the data collection and interpretation. All authors actively contributed to the writing and reviewing of the article and approved the final version.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards statement. The study was approved by the Ethical Committees of the participating ALS centres.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.