Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Book review
Brainspotting: Adventures in Neurology
  1. Matthew C Kiernan1,2
  1. 1 Brain and Mind Centre, Bushell Chair of Neurology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2 Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Matthew C Kiernan, Brain and Mind Centre, Bushell Chair of Neurology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2040, Australia; matthew.kiernan{at}sydney.edu.au

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Choose Life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose neurology.

While undertaking formal training in clinical neurology, I was fortunate to spend a few years at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square London. During the course of training, our team of registrars received a potpourri of seminars delivered by the consultant neurologists with whom we worked, usually in the form of a lunchtime meeting. While working down our NHS sandwiches, prior to the arrival of our consultant presenter, I recall a discussion commenced by the group: who among the consultants was the real deal? Through this process, each of the consultants was named and dissected, followed by assessment of their strengths and perceived weaknesses, a process that would then be followed by a vote. Caesear style, thumbs up or thumbs down, no words exchanged. When discussion arrived at Andrew Lees, the vote was universal – thumbs up, he was the real deal!

And so …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @jnnp_bmj

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.