608 e-Letters

  • RE: Neurofilament light chain and C reactive protein explored as predictors of survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    De Schaepdryver et al. assessed the prognostic ability of serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (1). Although two indicators can significantly predict the prognosis, the superiority by the combination of NfL and CRP should be checked for the analysis. I want to discuss NfL and ALS prognosis from recent publications.

    Verde et al. conducted a prospective study to determine the diagnostic and prognostic performance of serum NfL in patients with ALS (2). Serum NfL positively correlated with disease progression rate in patients with ALS, and higher levels were significantly associated with shorter survival. In addition, serum NfL did not differ among patients in different ALS pathological stages, and NfL levels were stable over time within each patient.

    Regarding the first query, Thouvenot et al. reported that serum NfL could be used as a prognostic marker for ALS at the time of diagnosis (3). Gille et al. recognized the relationship of serum NfL with motor neuron degeneration in patients with ALS (4). They described that serum NfL was significantly associated with disease progression rate and survival, and it could be recommended as a surrogate biomarker of ALS. These two papers presented no information whether NfL can be used for monitoring of ALS progression in each patient.

    De Schaepdryver et al. used two indicators, and I suspect that the authors can present information r...

    Show More
  • RE: Neurofilament light chain in serum for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Verde et al. conducted a prospective study to determine the diagnostic and prognostic performance of serum neurofilament light chain (NFL) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (1). Serum NFL positively correlated with disease progression rate in patients with ALS, and higher levels were significantly associated with shorter survival. In addition, serum NFL did not differ among patients in different ALS pathological stages, and NFL levels were stable over time within each patient. I have a concern about their study.

    Gille et al. also recognized the relationship of serum NFL with motor neuron degeneration in patients with ALS (2). They also recognized that serum NFL was significantly associated with disease progression rate and survival. Serum NFL can be recommended as a surrogate biomarker of ALS.

    Regarding the first concern, Thouvenot et al. also checked if serum NFL can be used as a prognostic marker for ALS at the time of diagnosis (3). By Cox regression analysis, NFL, weight loss and site at onset were independent predictive factors of mortality, and higher NFL concentration at the time of diagnosis is the strongest prognostic fact

    I recently discussed on serum neurofilament light chain in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (4), and these consistent results should also be verified by a meta-analysis of prospective studies.


    1. Verde F, Steinacker P, Weishaupt JH, et al. Neurofilament light chain in se...

    Show More
  • Autonomic symptoms as a predictor of disease progression and survival in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy

    Oliveira et al. evaluated the association between autonomic symptoms and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) with special reference to disease progression and survival (1). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CIs]) of early constipation and early urinary symptoms for the risk of first disease milestone of PSP were 0.88 (0.83 to 0.92) and 0.80 (0.75 to 0.86), respectively. In addition, adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of early constipation and early urinary symptoms for survival were 0.73 (0.64 to 0.84) and 0.88 (0.80 to 0.96), respectively. Furthermore, Richardson syndrome phenotype was significantly associated with shorter survival. The authors concluded that earlier urinary symptoms and constipation are closely associated with rapid disease progression and shorter survival in patients with PSP. I have two comments about their study.

    First, Glasmacher et al. conducted a meta-analysis to explore prognostic factors and survival in patients with PSP and multiple system atrophy (MSA) (2). In patients with PSP, adjusted HR (95% CI) of Richardson's phenotype against Parkinson's phenotype for shorter survival was 2.37 (1.21 to 4.64). In addition, adjusted HR (95% CI) of early fall for shorter survival in patients with PSP and MSA was 2.32 (1.94 to 2.77). Although some clinical symptoms are overlapping by common neurological damages, risk assessment for PSP and for MSA should be separately conducted. Stable estimates with enough number of samples and ev...

    Show More
  • Ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Kaji et al. evaluated the efficacy and safety of intramuscular ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin in 373 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (1). The primary endpoints were death or full ventilation support. Although there was no significant difference between treated and control group, 50 mg methylcobalamin-treated patients with early start within 12 months' duration of diagnosis showed longer time intervals to the primary event and keep the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score than the placebo group. The adverse effects by this treatment were similar and low prevalence among placebo, 25 mg or 50 mg groups. The authors recommend to verify the prognosis by this medication, and I have some concerns about their study.

    First, the authors did not allow the change of riluzole administration and did not handle patients with edaravone treatment. I think that the vitamin B12 analog treatment in combination with recent neuro-protective drugs might be acceptable for future trials (2). In addition, the efficacy for ALS by methylcobalamin should be specified by adjusting several confounders for the analysis.

    Relating to vitamin therapy for ALS, Rosenbohm et al. investigated the association of serum retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) with the onset and prognosis of ALS (3). Adjusted ORs (95% C) of the highest quartile of RBP4 against lowest quartile for incident ALS was 0.36 (0.22-0.59). In addition, serum RBP4 was inversely associated with m...

    Show More
  • Reducing Uncertainty and Expanding Patient Engagement in Deep Brain Stimulation Trials for Tourette Syndrome

    We appreciate the editorial by Dr. Muller-Vahl [1] about our recent article [2]. The large, international study group who co-authored our paper collectively felt that it would be useful to provide clarification of a few important points regarding the International Tourette Syndrome (TS) Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Database and Registry, the International Neuromodulation Registry, and our published analysis.

    There is widespread agreement on the need for more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of DBS for many indications, including TS, and there has been substantial discussion in the medical community about how these trials should be organized and carried out [3]. Our approach to overcome the challenges with the modest amount of data available for surgical therapies for TS has been to use symbiotic data sharing [4]. This approach encourages the broadening of investigative teams after publication of clinical studies to perform additional analyses and to develop new hypotheses. The key concept behind this approach is that new investigators work in a close, collaborative relationship with the teams that conducted the initial data collection. In addition, a recent viewpoint from the Food & Drug Administration in the United States reported that “For some devices, opportunities exist for leveraging alternative data sources, such as existing registries or modeling techniques, to allow regulators to have a good idea of the risks and benefits of...

    Show More
  • The utility of CSF biomarkers in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus?

    Dear Editor,
    The original article by Jeppsson et al. provides substantial perspectives regarding the diagnostic
    significance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in discriminating patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) from patients with other neurodegenerative disorders. 1 They have found that patients with iNPH had, compared with healthy individuals, lower concentrations of P-tau and APP-derived proteins in combination with elevated MCP-1 1. Moreover, compared with the non-iNPH disorders group, iNPH was characterized by the same significant change; low concentration of tau proteins and APP-derived proteins, and elevated MCP-1. I sincerely appreciate the authors for conducting such a large-scale study of a strictly interesting topic. However, I would like to make some comments hoping to provide a better understanding of some points and some perspectives to be kept in mind while planning future related studies
    In my opinion, the investigation of CSF biomarkers in patients with iNPH may provide several insights in addition to discriminating the iNPH patients from other neurodegenerative diseases. Certainly, these study results may give the opportunity to understand the unknown pathophysiological aspects of iNPH, thereby, even leading to new classifications of the disease. Actually, there may be many questions to be clarified regarding diagnostic approach, evaluation of the iNPH patients and even identification of the disease. 2,3...

    Show More
  • Split weakness signs in ALS
     I note the clinical analysis of differential weakness in ALS in elbow flexion (biceps brachii) compared to elbow extension (triceps) reported by Khalaf et al.1 This is described as analogous to similar 'split' muscle weakness around the ankle joint and, particularly, as that found in flexor digitorum indicis (FDI) compared to abductor digit minim (ADM) in the hand in the disease. It should be remembered that, although characteristic of ALS, this differential pattern of weakness has repeatedly been found not to be unique to ALS, even from the first descriptions.2,3 As the authors, and Vucic in his editorial remark,1,4 the cause of this interesting pattern of weakness in ALS remains uncertain. The finding of an association between the pattern of weakness and increased excitability in the upper motor neuron system in ALS does not necessarily provide primary support for an upper motor neuron (UMN) causation.  Nonetheless this pattern of weakness must be important in the disease. It is worth remembering that differential susceptibility to neurogenic lower motor neuron weakness is also a characteristic feature of some peripheral neuropathies, e.g., the Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndromes. Furthermore, differential muscle weakness and atrophy is a characteristic finding that is important in clinical diagnosis in the myriad different genetically determined muscular dystrophies.5 Although the causation of this differential susceptibility of certain muscles in this la...
    Show More
  • Authors' response to 'An overestimation?'

    We, the authors, thank Berthier for his comments on our study of 49 individuals with self-reported Foreign Accent Syndrome.

    In response, we would first like to clarify that we do not use Berthier’s term ‘psychogenic’, but ‘functional’ in our paper, referring to foreign accent symptoms due to changes in neural function rather than (or in addition to) the direct effects of a structural lesion. The body-mind dualism implied by the terms ‘psychological/psychogenic’ vs ‘neurogenic’ no longer holds water. Berthier himself notes that the differentiation between “functional” and “structural” may be artificial and that there has been great progress in “unveiling of the neural basis” of functional disorders. As we frequently emphasise in explaining the diagnosis to individuals with functional neurological disorders, their symptoms are definitely ‘real’; not ‘imagined’; and have a basis in changes in neural function which we are beginning to understand more clearly [1,2].

    We accept the limitations provided by our method of data collection, including limited data about investigations and a likelihood of selection bias where those with predominantly functional FAS may be somewhat over-represented in our sample. We wish to clarify, however, that cases were classified as ‘probably functional’ on the basis of reported positive clinical features of a functional disorder (e.g. periods of return to normal accent, adoption of stereotypical behaviours) and not by the presence...

    Show More
  • An overestimation of diagnosing functional foreign accent syndrome?

    Elucidating the nature of the foreign accent syndrome (FAS) can contribute to improve its diagnosis and treatment approaches. To understand this apparently rare syndrome, McWhirter et al. 1 studied a large case series of 49 subjects self-reporting having FAS. The participants were recruited via unmoderated online FAS support groups and surveys shared with neurologists and speech-language therapists from several countries. Participants completed an online protocol including validated scales tapping somatic symptoms, anxiety and depression, social-occupational function, and illness perception. They were also requested to provide speech samples recorded via computers or smartphones during oral reading and picture description. The overall clinical presentation of FAS in each participant was classified by consensus reached by three authors (2 neuropsychiatrists and 1 neurologist) in (1) “probably functional”, (2) “possibly structural” or (3) “probably structural”, wherein (1) meant no evidence of a neurological event or injury suggestive of a functional disorder but with no spontaneous remission; (2) alluded to the presence of some features suggestive of a functional disorder but with some uncertainty about a possible structural basis; and (3) denoted the evidence of a neurological event or injury coincident with the onset of FAS. The recorded speech samples were examined by experts to diagnose FAS and their frequent associated speech-language deficits (apraxia of speech, dysar...

    Show More
  • Response to: Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis: when methodology does not hold the promise

    We thank Dr Platt and colleagues for their critical review of our work, especially of the methodology that we have used in this study. It is understandable that comparative studies of treatment effectiveness trigger constructive discussions among industry and academics. We also vehemently agree that rigorous methodology and cautious interpretation of results is mandatory, especially for analyses of observational data.1 2 Therefore, in this letter, we will provide additional clarifications in response to the concerns raised.

    We appreciate that the categories that are underrepresented in multivariable logistic regression models may lead to inflation of estimates of the corresponding coefficients and their variance. Such inflation would, however, result in an overly conservative matching rather than the opposite. Due to the use of a caliper, patients with an extreme propensity score can not be matched to patients within the bulk of the distribution of the propensity scores. Such patients were excluded from the matched cohorts.

    The issue of residual imbalance is important in any non-randomised comparative study. We acknowledge that the standardised mean difference in annualised relapse rates (ARR) between teriflunomide and fingolimod exceeded the nominal threshold of 20%. It is therefore reassuring that the sensitivity analyses, in which the residual imbalance fell below the accepted threshold of 20% (patients with prior on-treatment relapses, Cohen’s d 14%, and...

    Show More