PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Crispin Jenkinson
AU  - Jonathan Mant
AU  - Judy Carter
AU  - Derick Wade
AU  - Simon Winner
TI  - The London handicap scale: a re-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation
AID  - 10.1136/jnnp.68.3.365
DP  - 2000 Mar 01
TA  - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
PG  - 365--367
VI  - 68
IP  - 3
4099  - http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/68/3/365.short
4100  - http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/68/3/365.full
SO  - J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2000 Mar 01; 68
AB  - OBJECTIVE To assess the validity of the London handicap scale (LHS) using a simple unweighted scoring system compared with traditional weighted scoring METHODS 323 patients admitted to hospital with acute stroke were followed up by interview 6 months after their stroke as part of a trial looking at the impact of a family support organiser. Outcome measures included the six item LHS, the Dartmouth COOP charts, the Frenchay activities index, the Barthel index, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Patients' handicap score was calculated both using the standard procedure (with weighting) for the LHS, and using a simple summation procedure without weighting (U-LHS). Construct validity of both LHS and U-LHS was assessed by testing their correlations with the other outcome measures. RESULTS Cronbach's α for the LHS was 0.83. The U-LHS was highly correlated with the LHS (r=0.98). Correlation of U-LHS with the other outcome measures gave very similar results to correlation of LHS with these measures. CONCLUSION Simple summation scoring of the LHS does not lead to any change in the measurement properties of the instrument compared with standard weighted scoring. Unweighted scores are easier to calculate and interpret, so it is recommended that these are used.