PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - M Olivecrona AU - M Rodling-Wahlström AU - S Naredi AU - L-O D Koskinen TI - S-100B and neuron specific enolase are poor outcome predictors in severe traumatic brain injury treated by an intracranial pressure targeted therapy AID - 10.1136/jnnp.2008.158196 DP - 2009 Nov 01 TA - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry PG - 1241--1248 VI - 80 IP - 11 4099 - http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/80/11/1241.short 4100 - http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/80/11/1241.full SO - J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2009 Nov 01; 80 AB - Objective: To prospectively study S-100B and neuron specific enolase (NSE) levels in subjects treated for severe head injury (sTBI), and investigate the prognostic value of these biomarkers.Methods: Subjects included in a prospective double blind randomised study for sTBI. Inclusion criteria: Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ⩽8, age 15–70 years, first recorded cerebral perfusion pressure of >10 mm Hg and arrival <24 h after trauma. Subjects were treated with an intracranial pressure (ICP) targeted therapy. Blood samples for S-100B and NSE were drawn immediately after arrival and every 12 h for 5 days. Outcome was evaluated as Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) by independent staff at 3 and 12 months.Results: 48 subjects, mean age 35.5 years, and median GCS 6 were included. The first blood sample was drawn at 15.6 (1.4) h after injury. Initial concentration of S-100B was 1.04 (0.21) μg/l and for NSE 18.94 (2.32) μg/l. The biomarkers were significantly higher in subjects with GCS 3 and in those who died compared with those with GCS 4–8 and GOS 2–5, respectively. Receiver operated characteristic curve analyses of the initial S-100B and NSE levels to GOS dichotomised as unfavourable (GOS 1–3) and favourable (GOS 4–5) showed a weak correlation: AUC 0.585 and 0.555, respectively. Using the dichotomisation dead (GOS 1)/alive (GOS 2–5), the AUC values were 0.687 and 0.734, respectively. Furthermore, a correlation was found between the biomarkers themselves and the biomarkers and ICP.Conclusion: At 3 and 12 months after trauma, no differences in prognostic values between the markers were apparent nor was there any clinical significant value of the markers as predictors of clinical outcome.