PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - van Kempen, ZoƩ L E AU - Stalman, Eileen W AU - Steenhuis, Maurice AU - Kummer, Laura Y L AU - van Dam, Koos P J AU - Wilbrink, Maarten F AU - ten Brinke, Anja AU - van Ham, S Marieke AU - Kuijpers, Taco AU - Rispens, Theo AU - Eftimov, Filip AU - Wieske, Luuk AU - Killestein, Joep ED - , TI - SARS-CoV-2 omicron breakthrough infections in patients with multiple sclerosis AID - 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330100 DP - 2023 Apr 01 TA - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry PG - 280--283 VI - 94 IP - 4 4099 - http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/94/4/280.short 4100 - http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/94/4/280.full SO - J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2023 Apr 01; 94 AB - Background It is unclear which patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are most susceptible for omicron breakthrough infections.Methods We assessed omicron breakthrough infections in vaccinated patients with MS with and without disease-modifying therapies enrolled in an ongoing large prospective study. We longitudinally studied humoral responses after primary and booster vaccinations and breakthrough infections.Results Omicron breakthrough infections were reported in 110/312 (36%) patients with MS, and in 105/110 (96%) infections were mild. Omicron breakthrough infections occurred more frequently in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapies and sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators, patients with impaired humoral responses after primary immunisation (regardless of treatment) and patients without prior SARS-CoV-2 infections. After infection, antibody titres increased in patients on S1PR modulator treatment while anti-CD20 treated patients did not show an increase.Conclusions SARS-COV-2 omicron breakthrough infections are more prevalent in patients with MS on anti-CD20 therapies and S1PR modulators compared with other patients with MS, which correlated with decreased humoral responses after vaccination. Humoral responses after infection were higher in S1PR modulator-treated patients in comparison to patients on anti-CD20 therapies, suggesting that immunological protection from contracting infection or repeated exposures may differ between these therapies.