Table 2

Significance of scores of patients with EMS compared with controls on the 15 principal neuropsychological components

FactorNeuropsychological testPatient (mean(SD))Controls (mean(SD))t ValueP value
1RAVLT: 5th learning trial12.65  (2.2)13.33  (2.2)0.990.33
RAVLT: % retained after interference83.50 (15.8)87.22 (19.7)0.670.51
RAVLT: % retained after delay98.33 (17.1)99.17 (13.5)0.170.87
2Symbol digit51.13 (9.9)61.72 (7.3)3.790.00052-150
Manual praxis14.80 (1.9)15.78 (0.5)1.020.32
Finger oscillation: right hand47.83 (8.6)51.09 (5.7)1.340.19
Finger oscillation: left hand43.77 (8.8)47.1 (5.5)1.350.19
3Complex figure: copy32.22 (3.2)33.89 (1.8)1.980.06
Complex figure: immediate recall15.39 (6.6)21.61 (5.1)3.300.00212-150
Complex figure: delayed recall14.87 (6.3)22.83 (5.2)4.330.00012-150
1, 2, 3Boston naming test54.52 (5.2)57.39 (3.0)0.300.76
4WCST: categories achieved3.82 (1.2)4.79 (0.7)3.160.00312-150
WCST: perseverative errors9.13 (5.2)5.83 (2.1)2.540.0152-150
5Digit span: forward7.61 (1.6)8.39 (1.7)1.480.15
Visual memory span: forward7.87 (1.8)8.67 (1.8)1.410.17
6Bell’s test32.48 (3.5)34.33 (0.9)2.180.04
Facial recognition45.00 (4.6)45.44 (5.1)0.290.78
7Road map test29.48 (2.4)30.83 (1.5)2.100.05
8Auditory selective attention test1.48 (1.7)0.11 (0.32)3.350.0022-150
Semantic fluency test22.00 (5.9)25.78 (5.0)2.160.04
Word fluency test44.22 (11.6)48.72 (12.8)1.180.25
  • 2-150 Indicates significance at the Bonferroni corrected level.