Table 3

CV, measurement times, and lesion volume of CSE, FSE, and fFLAIR

SequenceMarkCV1 (%) median (95% CI)CV2 (%) Rater 1Time (min) (n=22)
Median (range)
Volume (cm3) (n=25)
Median (range)3-152
Rater 1Rater 2Interrater
CSERO3.0 (2.5) (1.8–4.2)2.7 (2.3) (1.8–3.6)6.5 (5.7)
(5.1–7.8)
4.223.9 (3–52)3-151 20.2 (1.4–82.0)
FSERO3.1 (1.5) (1.8–4.4)4.316 (3–33)16.9 (1.6–70.3)
fFLAIRRO3.3 (2.5) (2.2–4.5)4.316.5 (4–30)20.1 (1.7–87.8)
fFLAIR filteredRO3.6 (2.5) (2.1–4.4)4.915.6 (5–34)19.9 (1.6–92.4)
fFLAIR filteredSI6.9 (3.7)3-150 (3.5–10.1)4.2 (3.0) (2.6–5.5)14.2 (10.2) (8.9–19.6)10.522.2 (7–65)3-151 22.7 (4.1–98.0)
  • 3-150 The CVs for this sequence were significantly higher than for the others (Wilcoxon t test for paired data, p<0.05).

  • 3-151 The times taken for analysis of these sequences (segmentation only, not initial lesion marking) were significantly longer than for the others, but not significantly different from each other (Wilcoxont test for paired data, p<0.05).

  • 3-152 These are the median and range of volumes from the first set of measurements. See results for significance of differences between the groups.