Table 2

Benefits and risks of screening people for > 60% asymptomatic carotid stenosis in different prevalence groups: realistic case scenario

Prevalence (%)Ultrasound to angiogram to surgeryUltrasound to MRA to surgeryUltrasound direct to surgery
Ratio benefit: harmNet strokes prevented/
10 000 screened
Strokes or deaths in false positives/
10 000 screened2-150
Ratio benefit: harmNet strokes prevented/
10 000 screened
Strokes or deaths in false positives/
10 000 screened2-150
Ratio benefit: harmNet strokes prevented/
10 000 screened
Strokes or deaths in false positives/
10 000 screened2-150
10.2−27300.6−370.1−4145
50.7−17291.61160.6−2343
100.9−4272.02861.0041
201.221242.36351.54536
251.334232.48151.76734
  • Assumptions: ultrasound sensitivity and specificity 85% each; MRA sensitivity and specificity 85% each; surgical risk of stroke or death=3%; angiographic risk of stroke or death=2%; reduction in risk of ipsilateral stroke for true positive severe stenosis from 11% to 3% over five years.

  • 2-150 Number of angiographic or surgical strokes or deaths caused in people who are false positives/10 000 screened.