Table 4

Comparison of models selected by backwards elimination algorithm from all potential secondary insult categories

ModelDevianceError rate (%)Brier scoreROC curve areap Value
24 h (n=90)LP only61.3815.60.10580.8623<0.001
LP and ICP (A)52.1011.10.08720.90470.002
LP and ICP (B)54.7611.10.09080.88810.010
LP and ICP (C)51.4711.10.08540.90970.002
LP and ICP (D)48.3211.10.07930.9159<0.001
48 h (n=105)LP only72.5514.30.10630.8369<0.001
LP and ICP (A)69.6115.20.10370.85400.086
LP and ICP (B)63.3213.30.09230.88620.002
LP and ICP (C)65.8715.20.09690.87820.010
LP and ICP (D)63.9514.30.09290.87450.003
72 h (n=104)LP only68.1013.50.09950.8340<0.001
All type A summaries eliminated
LP and ICP(B)62.3213.50.09250.87020.016
LP and ICP(C)62.7213.50.09310.87020.020
LP and ICP(D)62.6413.50.09200.86880.019
  • Insult summaries: A=presence or absence of any insult; B=total time in minutes with grade 1 or higher insult; C=percentage of good monitoring time (GMT) with grade 1 or higher insult; D=weighted percentage of good monitoring time (GMT) with insult.