Table 2

Patient characteristics

TinnitusHyperacusisNil auditoryAll
No of patients772943
Age (years)61.5 (±5.1)60.2 (±5.9)66 (±7.9)64.4 (±7.6)
Gender (M:F)4:35:215:1424:19
Symptom duration to MRI (years)5.1 (±3.0)5 (±3.0)4.62 (±2.1)4.8 (±2.3)
Naming
 GNT0 (n=1)0.5 (n=2)0.5 (n=8)0.5 (n=11)
 ONT5.8 (n=6)3.2 (n=5)6.6 (n=21)5.78 (n=32)
Executive function
 >10th centile341522
 5–10th centile1034
 <5th centile1247
Other non-verbal symptoms*22610
Hearing deficit (NSH)N=20N/AN/A
THI scaled score42/100 (n=2)N/AN/AN/A
HQ scaled score28.9/42 (±11.1); (n=2§)30.6/42 (±5.6); (n=6)N/AN/A
  • * Behavioural change or prosopagnosia at presentation.

  • Moderately severe.

  • Modified questionnaire from which scaled score devised to range from 0 (no symptom distress) to 42 (maximum distress) and score >28=significant auditory hypersensitivity.

  • § Both of these patients also reported hyperacusis.

  • Standard tests of executive function (available for 33 of 43 patients) included the Weigl Card Sorting Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the Trail Making Test Part B and the Stroop Task; best performance on any executive test is recorded.

  • GNT, Graded Naming Test; HQ, Hyperacusis Questionnaire; N/A, not available; NSH, National Study of Hearing Questionnaire; ONT, Oldfield Naming Test; THI, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.