Table 1

Summary of randomised controlled trials examining the effect of PCI on NCF and SRS versus WBRT+SRS

ReferencePatientsPrimary end pointDoseBaselineMain resultsStatistical significance
PCI: Arriagada et al76n=294, SCLCSurvival24 GyBaseline for ‘higher functions’ unpublished. Entire neuropsychological examination: #free from any abnormalities
Control: 44 PCI: 50
% With cognitive impairment assessed by ‘cumulative incidence of changes in neuropsychological assessment’ (higher functions)*
Control: 36% PCI: 30%
N
PCI: Gregor et al63n=314, SCLCSurvival8–36 GyPASAT
Control: 24% PCI: 24%
CFT
Control: 41% PCI: 42%
AVLT learning
Control: 31% PCI: 38%
AVLT retention
Control: 27% PCI: 24%
% With cognitive impairment assessed by
PASAT (1 year)
Control: 17% PCI: 31%
CFT (1 year)
Control: 17% PCI: 15%
AVLT learning (1 year)
Control: 40% PCI: 69%
AVLT retention (1 year)
Control: 38% PCI: 0%
N
PCI: Wolfson et al74n=264, SCLCNCF25 versus 36 GyStatistically significant differences for the COWAT (p=0.03) and TMT-A (adjusted p=0.03) at baseline among the three treatment groups% With cognitive impairment as defined by significant decrease in at least one NCF measure (HVLT, COWAT, TMT-A or TMT-B)
25 Gy: 62%; 36 Gy: 85%
Y
PCI: Le Pechoux et al77n=720, SCLCSurvival25 versus 36 Gy% Of patients with abnormal QoL-cognitive functioning (scale <75)
25 Gy: 23%; 36 Gy: 25%
% With cognitive impairment at 36 months as assessed by a physician using a scale of 1–4 at 2 years†
25 Gy: 35%; 36 Gy: 47%
N
PCI: Sun et al75n=340, NSCLCSurvival30 GyUnavailable. Baseline used for measurement of decline% With cognitive impairment at 1 year as assessed by HVLT
Control: 12% PCI: 41%
Y
SRS versus WBRT+SRS: Aoyama et al26 78n=132, misc. metastasesSurvival30 Gy
WBRT
Insignificant
SRS: 27 WBRT+SRS: 27
p=0.86
Median MMSE score at 12 months
SRS: 28 SRS+WBRT: 27
% With cognitive impairment assessed at 12 months as assessed by MMSE*
SRS: 32.5% SRS+WBRT: 48.1%
% With cognitive impairment assessed at 36 months as assessed by MMSE1
SRS: 48.1% SRS+WBRT: 85.3%
N
SRS versus WBRT+SRS: Chang et al27n=58, misc. metastasesNCF30 Gy
WBRT
HVLT (total recall)
SRS: –0.80 (1.53)
SRS+WBRT: –1.12 (1.50)
HVLT (delayed recall)
SRS: –0.73 (1.31)
SRS+WBRT: –1.32 (1.74)
% With cognitive impairment assessed at 3 months by
HVLT (total recall)
SRS: 24% SRS+WBRT: 52%
HVLT (delayed recall)
SRS: 6% SRS+WBRT: 22%
Y
  • *Assessment described as temporo-spatial orientation, memory, judgment (critique of an absurd story), language (spontaneous, dictated sentence and object names), praxis (drawing, dressing and ideomoter praxis) and mood status. Details of how these assessments were made were absent in the manuscript.

  • †Patients could either be rated as normal or have a grade 1 (minor loss of memory, reason and/or judgment), grade 2 (moderate loss of memory, reason and/or judgment), grade 3 (major intellectual impairment) or grade 4 (complete memory loss/incapable of rational thought) cognitive impairment.

  • AVLT, Auditory Verbal Learning Test; CFT, Complex Figure Test; COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association; HVLT, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Exam; NCF, neurocognitive function; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PASAT, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test; PCI, prophylactic cranial irradiation; QoL, quality of life; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery; TMT, Trail-Making Test; WBRT, whole brain radiation therapy.