Table 1

This table shows results from a systematic review of studies on active paradigms of consciousness testing in VS and MCS (n≥20 patients)

SourceSiteModalityDesignClinical ratingSerial testingTaskN (VS, MCS)Aetiology TBI, CVA, anoxia, otherCommand following
Bekinschtein et al56Buenos Aires, ArgentinafMRISingle (p)CRS-RNoMotor imaginary24 (24, 0ns2/24 VS
Monti et al34Cambridge, UKfMRISingle (p)CRS-RNoSpeech24 (8, 16)16 TBI, 12 non-TBI3/8 VS; 6/16 MCS
Monti et al21Cambridge, UK; Liège, BelgiumfMRI2 centres (p)CRS-RNoMotor, spatial imagery54 (23, 31)32, 3, 15, 42/23 VS, 3/31 MCS
Stender et al33Liège, BelgiumfMRISingle (p)CRS-RNoMotor, spatial imagery70 (28, 42)ns3/28 VS, 19/42 MCS
Chennu et al53 54Cambridge, UKfMRISingle (p)CRS-RNoMotor imaginary32 (13, 19)23, 0, 9, 04/13 VS, 11/19 MCS
Forgacs et al43New York, New York, USAfMRISingle (p)CRS-RLimitedMotor, spatial imagery20 (6, 14)13, 3, 3, 10/6 VS, 3/14 MCS
Cruse et al48 49Cambridge, UK; Liège, BelgiumEEG2 centres (p)CRS-RNoMotor imaginary39 (16, 23)20 TBI, 19 non-TBI3/16 VS, 5/23 MCS
Faugeras et al7 11Paris, FranceEEGSingle (p)CRS-RLimitedAuditory (local-global)41 (22, 19)11, 14, 17, 72/22 VS, 4/19 MCS
King et al39 40Paris, FranceEEGSingle (p)CRS-RLimitedAuditory (local-global)95 (56, 39)20, 33, 30, 219/56 VS, 9/39 MCS
Kotchoubey et al37Tübingen, DEEEGSingle (p)DRSNoSpeech88 (50, 38)31, 27, 27, 311/50 VS, 10/38 MCS
Rohaut et al27Paris, FranceEEGSingle (p)CRS-RNoAuditory (local-global)29 (15, 14)7, 9, 8, 50/15 VS, 5/14 MCS
Schnakers et al28Liège, BelgiumEEGSingle (p)CRS-RNoSpeech22 (8, 14)10, 2, 8, 20/8 VS, 9/14 MCS
  • For studies with n<20, please see online supplementary table S1.

  • CRS-R, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised; CVA, cerebrovascular accident (including cerebral infarction, parenchymal haemorrhage, subarachnoid bleeding); ns—not specified; DRS, Disability Rating Scale; fMRI, functional MRI; MCS, minimal conscious state; P, prospective; TBI, traumatic brain injury; VS, vegetative state.