Table 2

Comparisons of SID and EID groups on MS activity variables

SIDTotal EIDEEDLEDVEDWithin EID
Participants (n)1080894246269379
Number of MRIs2.91 (2.36)4.98* (4.14)4.98* (4.98)4.05* (2.90)5.63* (4.18)VED, >EED, LED
Patients with T2 lesions161/946
=17%
75/653*
=11%
18/234
=8%
28/255*
=11%
57/360†
=16%
VED>LED, EED
Scans with T2 lesions193/2607
7.0%
122/4253*
2.9%
17/1103*
1.5%
28/1084*
2.6%
77/2066*
3.6%
Patients with Gad lesions64/1019
=6%
65/683†
=10%
9/195
=5%
11/142†
=8%
45/346*
13%
Scans with Gad lesions111/2521
4.4%
93/3666†
2.5%
14/1060†
1.3%
13/537
2.4%
66/2069†
3.1%
VED>LED
Patients with clinical relapse247/1068
23%
157/883*
18%
53/241
22%
24/266*
9%
80/376
21%
VED, EED>LED
Total relapses (per group, per participant)354
0.35 (0.81)
218*
0.26 (0.70)
82*
0.41 (0.99)
46
0.13 (0.51)
90†
0.26 (0.57)
LED<EED, VED
Patients with steroids218/960
23%
126/622
20%
42/203*
11%
25/148
17%
59/271
22%
LED, VED>EED
Total steroids (per group, per participant)354
0.37 (0.87)
218
0.35 (0.93)
82*
0.40 (1.0)
46*
0.31 (1.0)
90
0.33 (0.78)
EED>LED
Adjusted annualised relapse rate0.150.12*0.110.08†0.12EED>LED, VED
  • Means and SDs (in parentheses).

  • (A) Comparisons in columns 2–5 are to SID group. Comparisons between the three EID groups (EED vs LED vs VED) are displayed in column 6. (B) Since the adjusted annualised relapse rate was allowed to vary across site, the rates in table 1 are the marginal means treating site as balanced.

  • *Indicates EID group differs from SID group at p<0.05.

  • †Indicates EID group differs from SID group at 0.05<p<0.10.

  • EED, early extended dosing; EID, extended interval dosing; LED, late extended dosing; SID, standard interval dosing; VED, variable extended dosing.