Table 1

Comparisons of SID and EID groups on demographic variables

SIDTotal EIDEEDLEDVEDWithin EID
Participants (n)1080894246269379
Percentage female7073*79†6473EED>LED>VED
Age45.48 (11.48)45.59 (11.67)48.24† (11.46)43.44 (12.04)45.40† (11.22)EED>LED
BMI27.84 (6.70)26.59 (5.63)27.00 (5.62)25.94 (5.18)26.91 (6.02)
JC virus positive50%63%†66%†67%†58%†
Median JC virus index0.22 (0.99)0.75 (1.25)1.63* (1.36)0.69 (1.22)0.34* (1.06)
Prior immunosuppressives (%)1217927†15†LED, VED>EED
Disease duration12.03 (7.39)13.22† (7.26)13.86† (7.88)12.84† (6.48)13.09† (7.37)VED>LED
NTZ doses27.39 (18.24)40.07† (21.66)51.62† (27.23)33.74† (15.83)37.08† (18.06)EED>VED, LED
Total extended duration doses24.96 (15.67)20.62 (12.66)24.92† (14.66)27.80† (17.43)
  • Means and SDs (in parentheses).

  • Comparisons in columns 2–5 are to SID group. Comparisons between the three EID groups (EED vs LED vs VED) are displayed in column 6. Comparisons of total extended duration doses were made with the EED group as the reference and VED and LED as dummy variables.

  • *Indicates EID group differs from SID group at 0.05<p<0.10.

  • †Indicates EID group differs from SID group at p<0.05.

  • BMI, body mass index; EED, early extended dosing; EID, extended interval dosing; LED, late extended dosing; NTZ, natalizumab; SID, standard interval dosing; VED, variable extended dosing.