Table 1

Comparison of clinical and laboratory features between immunotherapy responding chronic axonal polyneuropathy (IR-CAP) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)

FeaturesIR-CAP (N=33)CIDP (N=58)*
Sex: male/female15/1819/39
Mean (range) age, years57.2 (27–79)44.4 (4–79)
Mean duration (range) of progression, months10.5 (2–84)15.1 (2.1–300)
Previous episodes5 (15%)12 (21%)
Antecedent infection or event8 (24%)8 (14%)
Clinical subtypes
 Motor sensory30 (91%)37 (64%)
  Symmetrical26 (79%)30 (52%)
  Asymmetrical47
 Motor2†18†
  Symmetrical2 (5%)15 (26%)
  Asymmetrical03
 Sensory14
  Symmetrical13
  Asymmetrical01
Proximal muscle weakness25 (76%)39 (67%)
Cranial nerve involvement63
Respiratory failure21
Relapse14 (42%)29 (50%)
Spontaneous improvement00
High spinal fluid protein, mg/dL
 Mean (range)97.7 (32–660)99.4 (18–770)
 >55 (high)25/32 (78%)32/49 (65%)
Response to treatment
 No improvement6/51 (12%)
 Improvement to normal7/33 (21%)16/53 (30%)
 Disability score (SD)
  At onset6.656.83
  At best improvement3.432.65
  % mean improvement48%61%
  • *Cited from reference.6

  • †P =0.0057 for motor types (symmetrical and asymmetrical motor).