Elsevier

Brain and Cognition

Volume 40, Issue 2, July 1999, Pages 355-386
Brain and Cognition

Regular Article
Articulatory Consequences of Parkinson's Disease: Perspectives from Two Modalities

https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1998.1086Get rights and content

Abstract

Language production involves complex yet productively varying motor behavior. Rule-governed combinations yield a finite set of formational units combined in an infinite number of ways. The creativity of language ensures that no particular articulation will be highly automatized. Linguistic articulation is highly complex and varied. As such, it differs from the other more automatized motor behaviors typically studied such as learned movements in apraxia studies or repetitive behavior as occurs in walking or other everyday activities. Language also strives to maintain a balance between ease of articulation and ease of perception, while maintaining linguistically relevant distinctions. We report here a number of studies on the articulatory consequences of Parkinson's disease (PD) in the spoken and signed modalities. Our goal is to highlight the commonalities and distinctions between the two modalities of speech and sign that will allow us to better understand the impingements of PD on language production in general.

References (49)

  • D. Brentari et al.

    A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer

    Language and Cognitive Processes

    (1994)
  • J.F.V. Caekebeke et al.

    The interpretation of dysprosody in patients with Parkinson's disease

    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • H. Cohen

    Disorders of prosody in Parkinson's disease

    Society for Neuroscience Abstracts

    (1994)
  • Cohen, H, Laframboise, M, &, Labelle, A. 1994. (February), Dysprosody in Parkinson's disease. Paper presented at the...
  • H. Cohen et al.

    Speech timing deficits in Parkinson's Disease

    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

    (1993)
  • Corina, D, Bellugi, U, &, Reilly, J. 1996, Neural systems underlying linguistic and affective facial expressions in...
  • F.L. Darley et al.

    Motor Speech Disorders

    (1975)
  • J. Gee et al.

    Narrative/Story Structure, Pausing and American Sign Language

    Discourse Processes

    (1983)
  • M. Hallett et al.

    A physiological mechanism of bradykinesia

    Brain

    (1980)
  • P. Jennings et al.

    Computer graphic modeling and analysis II: Three-dimensional reconstruction and interactive analysis

    Journal of Neuroscience Methods

    (1998)
  • J. Kegl et al.

    The interplay between linguistic and spatial processing in a right-lesioned signer

    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

    (1991)
  • Kegl, J, &, Poizner, H. 1993, Preservation of syntactic distinctions in a moderate to severe parkinsonian signer. Paper...
  • J. Kegl et al.

    Losing face: Differential breakdown in the production of facial expressions

    Society for Neuroscience, Abstracts

    (1998)
  • E. Keller

    Signalyze Version 2.0: Signal Analysis for Speech and Sound. User's Manual

    (1991)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Advances in Parkinson's Disease detection and assessment using voice and speech: A review of the articulatory and phonatory aspects

      2021, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several studies previous to 1970 described the speech of people with PD [4,5], although it is not until 1969 [6,7] that a group of researchers analyzed more thoroughly the problems of phonation, prosody, and articulation of PD patients. Since then, a plethora of studies have presented evidence that the neurodegenerative processes associated with PD cause dysphonia and dysarthria, particularly hypokinetic dysarthria [6,8–10] in different stages of the disease [11]. Dysphonia can be defined as the speaker's incapacity to produce a normal phonation due to the phonatory system's impaired functioning, while dysarthria is more related to problems with articulation when pronouncing words.

    • A forced gaussians based methodology for the differential evaluation of Parkinson's Disease by means of speech processing

      2019, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      The neurodegenerative processes associated to Parkinson's Disease (PD) cause multidimensional voice and speech impairments called dysphonia [1], dysprosody [2,3] and dysarthria in patients, in particular hypokinetic dysarthria [4–7].

    • Analysis of speaker recognition methodologies and the influence of kinetic changes to automatically detect Parkinson's Disease

      2018, Applied Soft Computing Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Speech production, an ability that is almost universal, might be affected by PD since it involves complex and very precise movements, but on spite of being good candidate for PD detection and evaluation, its capabilities have not been deeply exploited yet. It is well known that the neurodegenerative processes associated to the disorder cause hypokinetic dysarthria, thus producing a reduction of loudness and articulation amplitude, slowing down the speech sometimes and principally reducing intelligibility [5–9]. Literature evidences the influence of PD on speech from early to advanced stages although it is mainly perceived in mild to advanced phases [10–12].

    • Communication changes in Parkinson's disease

      2009, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Precision in stressed syllables may be maintained at the expense of sound realisations in unstressed syllables, which are particularly prone to articulatory breakdown (Ackermann and Ziegler, 1991). Kegl and Poizner (1999) have shown that the same effects are observed in the manual gestures of people with PD who use deaf sign language. As already noted, there is a prominent prosodic disturbance in PD related to the changes to sound pressure level and its variation and alterations to control of fundamental frequency level, range and variation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by Research Grants SBR-9513762 and SBR-9729065 from the National Science Foundation to Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; NSF BCS9996297 to University of Southern Maine (JK); Research Grant DC 01664 from the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health; and Research Grant 5 R01 NS36449-02 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health (HP); and 99-ER-0404 from FCAR (Québec) (HC). We thank Patricia Trowbridge, Joanne Lauser, Drucilla Ronchen, Vicki Joy Sullivan, Toni Fuller, Jimmy Challis Gore, Ruth Loew, and the The George Neville Home for their contributions to this research and Bencie Woll for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

    Correspondence and reprint requests should be sent to Judy Kegl at the Language Sciences Laboratory, University of Southern Maine, 96 Falmouth Street, Portland, ME 04104-9300.

    View full text