Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 13, Issue 4, April 2001, Pages 743-750
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Distinct Neural Systems for the Encoding and Recognition of Topography and Faces

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0712Get rights and content

Abstract

In a series of three positron emission tomography experiments the functional neuroanatomy of four different types of visual stimuli was investigated within the same experimental context. The stimuli were unknown buildings, landscapes, human faces, and animal faces. The purpose of the present study was to compare the stimulus types, both within the same category and across category, by examining if, at encoding (with several seconds exposure to each stimulus) or recognition (over time scales of minutes compared to the seconds of usual perception/one-back studies), common or different neural circuits were activated for all types/categories of stimuli. Within category and although visually very different, the encoding of both buildings and landscapes activated a similar set of brain regions, including bilateral parahippocampal gyrus. This was in contrast to the encoding of both human and animal faces, both of which resulted in activation of the fusiform gyrus bilaterally. Despite the perceptual inputs being identical to those during encoding, the recognition of both buildings and landscapes activated only unilateral right parahippocampal gyrus, while recognition of both human and animal faces activated unilateral right fusiform gyrus. In addition, right superior frontal gyrus and right inferior and medial parietal areas were more active during recognition compared with encoding for all stimulus types. Overall the data identify differential patterns of activation for encoding compared with retrieval of visual stimuli. Furthermore, medial temporal structures specifically are involved in the explicit learning and long-term recognition of topographically relevant stimuli, be they buildings or landscapes, while lateral temporal structures support nontopographical learning and recognition, in this case either human or animal faces.

References (43)

  • E.A. Maguire et al.

    Human spatial navigation: Cognitive maps, sexual dimorphism, and neural substrates

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (1999)
  • E.A. Maguire et al.

    Topographical disorientation following unilateral temporal lobe lesions in humans

    Neuropsychologia

    (1996)
  • S. Pigott et al.

    Memory for different aspects of complex visual scenes after unilateral temporal- or frontal-lobe resection

    Neuropsychologia

    (1993)
  • L.L. Chao et al.

    Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • L.L. Chao et al.

    Are face-responsive regions selective only for faces?

    NeuroReport

    (1999)
  • R. Epstein et al.

    A cortical representation of the local visual environment

    Nature

    (1998)
  • A.C. Evans et al.

    3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes

  • J.J. Evans et al.

    Progressive prosopagnosia associated with selective right temporal lobe atrophy. A new syndrome?

    Brain

    (1995)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging. A general linear approach

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (1995)
  • I. Gauthier et al.

    Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • M.L. Gorno-Tempini et al.

    The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing

    Brain

    (1998)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Age, sex, and verbal abilities affect location of linguistic connectivity in ventral visual pathway

      2013, Brain and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      As children grow older and improve reading performance, linguistic connectivity may thus shift (or expand) from the temporal lobe into occipital cortex, reflecting an increased awareness of individual letter combinations. Alternatively, lateral temporal regions show stimulus specificity for smaller (or more centralized) objects than medial temporal regions (Hasson, Harel, Levy, & Malach, 2003; Lerner et al., 2003; Levy, Hasson, Avidan, Hendler, & Malach, 2001; see also Chao, Martin, & Haxby, 1999; Maguire, Frith, & Cipolotti, 2001a); thus, increased awareness of letter combinations as children become better readers with age might instead result in a lateral shift (or expansion) of lexical connectivity within the temporal lobe. Such a shift would be analogous (but opposite in direction) to the lateral-to-medial shift in fusiform face processing with age with improvements in recognizing global features (Chao et al., 1999).

    • TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects

      2012, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      This suggests that brain regions mediating endogenous attention, including frontal, parietal and temporal regions, may provide resistance to this perceptual confusion and facilitate the perception of concealed objects. This relationship between activity in areas mediating endogenous attention and performance in tasks involving object detection is supported by a number of prior studies that suggest an important role for frontal, parietal, middle and superior temporal areas in object categorization and visual search tasks (Beauchamp et al., 2004; Clark et al., 1996; Coull et al., 1996; Maguire et al., 2001; Fan et al., 2005; Buschman and Miller, 2007; Cabeza et al., 2008) and in attentional networks that facilitate the classification of objects (Clark and Hillyard, 1996; Posner and Peterson, 1990), extraction of categorical information from objects (Freedman et al., 2001; Nieder et al., 2002), and other relevant cognitive processes (Ericsson and Staszewski, 1989; Miller et al., 1996; Rao et al., 1997). It follows that these brain networks may contribute to the recognition of hidden and concealed objects, in part by supporting endogenous attentional processes required to perform these tasks.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    To whom correspondence should be addressed at the Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Fax: +44-20-78131420. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text