Background There is increasing interest in evaluation of the pulse amplitude of intracranial pressure (AMP) in explaining dynamic aspects of hydrocephalus. We reviewed a large number of ICP recordings in a group of hydrocephalic patients to assess utility of AMP.
Materials and methods From a database including approximately 2,100 cases of infusion studies (either lumbar or intraventricular) and overnight ICP monitoring in patients suffering from hydrocephalus of various types (both communicating and non-communicating), etiology and stage of management (non-shunted or shunted) pressure recordings were evaluated. For subgroup analysis we selected 60 patients with idiopathic NPH with full follow-up after shunting. In 29 patients we compared pulse amplitude during an infusion study performed before and after shunting with a properly functioning shunt. Amplitude was calculated from ICP waveforms using spectral analysis methodology.
Findings A large amplitude was associated with good outcome after shunting (positive predictive value of clinical improvement for AMP above 2.5 mmHg was 95%). However, low amplitude did not predict poor outcome (for AMP below 2.5 mmHg 52% of patients improved). Correlations of AMP with ICP and Rcsf were positive and statistically significant (N=131 with idiopathic NPH; R= 0.21 for correlation with mean ICP and 0.22 with Rcsf; p< 0.01). Correlation with the brain elastance coefficient (or PVI) was not significant. There was also no significant correlation between pulse amplitude and width of the ventricles. The pulse amplitude decreased (p<0.005) after shunting.
Conclusions Interpretation of the ICP pulse waveform may be clinically useful in patients suffering from hydrocephalus. Elevated amplitude seems to be a positive predictor for clinical improvement after shunting. A properly functioning shunt reduces the pulse amplitude.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avezaat CJ, Eijndhoven JH (1986) Clinical observations on the relationship between cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and intracranial pressure. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 79(1):13–29
Borgesen SE, Gjerris F (1982) The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 105(Pt 1):65–86
Bergsneider M, Alwan AA, Falkson L, Rubinstein EH (1998) The relationship of pulsatile cerebrospinal fluid flow to cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure: a new theoretical model. Acta Neurochir Supp 71:266–268
Bradley WG Jr, Scalzo D, Queralt J, Nitz WN, Atkinson DJ, Wong P (1996) Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 198(2):523–529
Christensen L, Borgesen SE (1989) Single pulse pressure wave analysis by fast Fourier transformation. Neurol Res 11(4):197–200
Czosnyka M, Wollk-Laniewski P, Batorski L, Zaworski W (1988) Analysis of intracranial pressure waveform during infusion test. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 93(3–4):140–145
Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Owler B, Momjian S, Kasprowicz M, Schmidt EA, Smielewski P, Pickard JD (2005) Clinical testing of CSF circulation in hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 95:247–251
Di Rocco C, Pettorossi VE, Caldarelli M, Mancinelli R, Velardi F (1977) Experimental hydrocephalus following mechanical increment of intraventricular pulse pressure. Experientia 33 (11):1470–1472
Dombrowski SM, Schenk S, Leichliter A, Leibson Z, Fukamachi K, Luciano MG (2006) Chronic hydrocephalus-induced changes in cerebral blood flow: mediation through cardiac effects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26(10):1298–1310
Egnor M, Zheng L, Rosiello A, Gutman F, Davis R (2002) A model of pulsations in communicating hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 36(6):281–303
Eide PK, Brean A (2006) Intracranial pulse pressure amplitude levels determined during preoperative assessment of subjects with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148(11):1151–1156
Foltz EL, Aine C (1981) Diagnosis of hydrocephalus by CSF pulse-wave analysis: a clinical study. Surg Neurol 15(4):283–293
Greitz D, Hannerz J, Rahn T, Bolander H, Ericsson A (1994) MR imaging of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in health and disease. On the vascular pathogenesis of communicating hydrocephalus and benign intracranial hypertension. Acta Radiol 35(3):204–211
Greitz D (2004) Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: new theories and implications for therapy. Neurosurg Rev 27(3):145–165 discussion 166–167
Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, Jungling FD, Droste DW, Wakhloo AK (1997) Flow void of cerebrospinal fluid in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: can it predict outcome after shunting? Neurosurgery 40(1):67–73
Kuchiwaki H, Misu N, Kageyama N, Ishiguri H, Takada S (1987) Periodic oscillation of intracranial pressure in ventricular dilation: a preliminary report. Neurol Res 9(4):218–224
Lenfeldt N, Andersson N, Agren-Wilsson A, Bergenheim AT, Koskinen LO, Eklund A, Malm J (2004) Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure method: a possible substitute for the examination of B waves. J Neurosurg 101(6):944–950
Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 36(149):1–193
Marmarou A, Bergsnaider M, Klinge P, Relkin N, Black PM (2005) The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57(3 Suppl):S17–S28
Matsumoto T, Nagai H, Kasuga Y, Kamiya K (1986) Changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse wave following hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 82(1–2):50–56
Momjian S, Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD (2004) Link between vasogenic waves of intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Br J Neurosurg 18(1):56–61
Ohara S, Nagai H, Matsumoto T, Banno T (1988) MR imaging of CSF pulsatory flow and its relation to intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 69(5):675–682
Pettorossi VE, Di Rocco C, Mancinelli R, Caldarelli M, Velardi F (1978) Communicating hydrocephalus induced by mechanically increased amplitude of the intraventricular cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure: rationale and method. Exp Neurol 59(1):30–39
Portnoy HD, Chopp M, Branch C, Shannon MB (1982) Cerebrospinal fluid pulse waveform as an indicator of cerebral autoregulation. J Neurosurg 56(5):666–678
Stephensen H, Andersson N, Eklund A, Malm J, Tisell M, Wikkelso C (2005) Objective B wave analysis in 55 patients with non-communicating and communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76(7):965–970
Stephensen H, Tisell M, Wikkelso C (2002) There is no transmantle pressure gradient in communicating or noncommunicating hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 50(4):763–771
Wagshul ME, Chen JJ, Egnor MR, McCormack EJ, Roche PE (2006) Amplitude and phase of cerebrospinal fluid pulsations: experimental studies and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 104 (5):810–819
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this paper
Cite this paper
Czosnyka, Z. et al. (2008). Pulse amplitude of intracranial pressure waveform in hydrocephalus. In: Steiger, H.J. (eds) Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 102. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-85578-2_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-85578-2_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-85577-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-85578-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)