Skip to main content
Log in

Chronic spondylogenic cervical myelopathy. A critical evaluation of surgical treatment after early and long-term follow-up

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past, chronic spondylogenic cervical myelopathy has been thought of being a disease often resistent to neurosurgical therapy. 56 out of 70 patient treated by laminectomy or different ventral fusion procedures improved immediately following operation. Only 36, however, continued to be improved at follow-up 5 to 8 years later, whereas additional 8 had worsened again, and another 5 mean-while had died due to myelopathy. Laminectomy turned out to be the least succesful procedure of treatment. Nevertheless, early diagnosis, early operation, appropriate and individual surgical procedures, careful re-evaluation at follow-up, and — if needed — an early decision for a second-step operation can impressively improve the prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ito T, H Tsuji: Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine 10 (1985) 729–736

    Google Scholar 

  2. Montazem A, P Herzog: Laminoplastik bei cervikaler Spinalkanalstenose. Mainzer Herbsttagung 29. 09. 1988

  3. Wohlert L, M Buhl, EF Eriksen et al: Treatment of cervical disc disease using Cloward's Technique. III. Evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 138 cases. Acta Neurochir 71 (1984) 121–131

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnold, H., Feldmann, U. & Mißler, U. Chronic spondylogenic cervical myelopathy. A critical evaluation of surgical treatment after early and long-term follow-up. Neurosurg. Rev. 16, 105–109 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258239

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258239

Keywords

Navigation