Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of quantitative measures with the modified Ashworth scale in the assessment of plantar flexor spasticity in patients with traumatic brain injury

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study of plantar flexor spasticity describes relationships among a traditional qualitative spasticity scale, three potential quantitative spasticity measures and a measure of voluntary ankle muscle function. Thirty-four volunteer adult patients with traumatic brain injuries participated. There were 28 males and 6 females; the mean age was 30.3 years. A battery of five randomly sequenced tests was performed for each subject on one ankle. Tests were: modified Ashworth scale (MAS) scoring; H-reflex testing with and without Achilles tendon vibration; H-reflex testing with and without dorsiflexor contraction; reflex threshold angle and timed toe tapping (TTT). Twenty-six subjects returned to have the second ankle tested, resulting in 60 ankles for the analyses. Spearman's coefficients for correlation of quantitative spasticity measures with MAS scores ranged from 0.39 to 0.49 with associated probabilities ≤ 0.002. Pearson coefficients for correlation of quantitative spasticity measures with TTT scores were lower but also significant (P ≤ 0.07). Multiple correlation for the set of quantitative measures yieldedR = 0.614 (P < 0.001) with MAS scores andR = 0.365 (P = 0.045) with TTT scores. These findings reveal statistically significant relationships of low to moderate strength among potential quantitative spasticity measures, a traditional qualitative spasticity scale and a simple measure of voluntary ankle muscle function. Understanding these relationships is an essential part of the ongoing search for quantitative spasticity measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison SC, Abraham LD, Petersen CL. Reliability of the modified Ashworth scale in the assessment of plantar-flexor muscle spasticity in patients with traumatic brain injury (in press)

  2. Bohannon RW (1987) Gait performance of hemiparetic stroke patients: selected variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68: 777–781

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohannon RW, Smith MB (1987) Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 67: 206–207

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boorman GI, Becker WJ, Lee RG (1992) Impaired “natural” reciprocal inhibition in patients with spinal spasticity. Abstr Soc Neurosci 18: 1408

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crone C, Hultborn H, Jespersen B, et al (1987) Reciprocal Ia inhibition between ankle flexors and extensors in man. J Physiol (Lond) 389: 163–185

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gillies JD, Lance JW, Neilson PD, et al (1969) Presynaptic inhibition of the monosynaptic reflex by vibration. J Physiol (Lond) 205: 329–339

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giuliani C (1988) Should we measure spasticity, tone and other ugly terms? Neurol Rep 12: 4

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guilford JP (1956) Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hagbarth KE (1973) The effect of muscle vibration in normal man and in patients with motor disorders. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, vol 3. Human reflexes, pathophysiology of motor systems, methodology of human reflexes. Karger, Basel, pp 428–443

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hugenholtz H, Nelson RF, Dehoux E, et al (1992) Intrathecal baclofen for intractable spinal spasticity: a doubleblind cross-over comparison with placebo in 6 patients. Can J Neurol 19: 188–195

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hugon M (1973) Proprioceptive reflexes and the H-reflex: methodology of the Hoffmann reflex in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, vol 3. Human reflexes, pathophysiology of motor systems, methodology of human reflexes. Karger, Basel, pp 277–293

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iles JF, Roberts RC (1986) Presynaptic inhibition of monosynaptic reflexes in the lower limbs of subjects with upper motoneuron disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49: 937–944

    Google Scholar 

  13. Katz RT, Rymer WZ (1989) Spastic hypertonia: mechanisms and measurement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70: 144–155

    Google Scholar 

  14. Katz RT, Roval GP, Brait C, et al (1992) Objective quantification of spastic hypertonia: correlation with clinical findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73: 339–347

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lance JW, Burke D, Andrews CJ (1973) The reflex effects of muscle vibration. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, vol 3. Human reflexes, pathophysiology of motor systems, methodology of human reflexes. Karger, Basel, pp 444–462

    Google Scholar 

  16. Landau WM (1974) Spasticity: the fable of a neurological demon and the emperor's new therapy. Arch Neurol 31: 217–219

    Google Scholar 

  17. Latash ML (1993) Control of human movement. Human Kinetics, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leonard CT, Mortiani T, Hirschfeld H, et al (1990) Deficits in reciprocal inhibition of children with cerebral palsy as revealed by H reflex testing. Dev Med Child Neurol 32: 974–984

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levin MF, Hui-Chan C (1993) Are H and stretch reflexes in hemiparesis reproducible and correlated with spasticity? J Neurol 240: 63–71

    Google Scholar 

  20. Milanov I (1992) A comparative study of methods for estimation of presynaptic inhibition. J Neurol 239: 287–292

    Google Scholar 

  21. Milanov IG (1992) Mechanisms of baclofen action on spasticity. Acta Neurol Scand 85: 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nance PW, Shears AH, Nance DM (1989) Reflex changes induced by clonidine in spinal cord injured patients. Paraplegia 27: 296–301

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pierrot-Deseilligny E (1990) Electrophysiological assessment of the spinal mechanisms underlying spasticity. In: Rossini PM, Mauguiere F (eds) New trends and advanced techniques in clinical neurophysiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 264–273

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rose SA, Ounpuu S, Deluca PA (1991) Strategies for the assessment of pediatric gait in the clinical setting. Phys Ther 71: 961–980

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sahrmann SA, Norton BJ (1977) The relationship of voluntary movement to spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome. Ann Neurol 2: 460–465

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sloan RL, Sinclair E, Thompson J, et al (1992) Inter-rater reliability of the modified Ashworth scale for spasticity in hemiplegic patients. Int J Rehabil Res 15: 158–161

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allison, S.C., Abraham, L.D. & Allison, S.C. Correlation of quantitative measures with the modified Ashworth scale in the assessment of plantar flexor spasticity in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurol 242, 699–706 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00866923

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00866923

Key words

Navigation