Skip to main content
Log in

The Babinski sign: The first hundred years

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The year 1996 marks the centenary of Babinski's description of the toe responses (normal and pathological) after stimulation of the sole of the foot. The upgoing toe response is normal in the 1st year of life and forms part of the flexion synergy of the leg, which had been known before 1896. Babinski also recognized the relation between the toe phenomenon (phénomène des orteils) in older children and adults and dysfunction of the pyramidal system. Neurologists became so fascinated by toe responses alone that many competing signs were proposed; most of these consisted of stimuli at other parts of the leg and were actually part of the same — but temporarily forgotten - flexion synergy. From 1910 to 1915 Marie and Foix and also Walshe re-emphasized this relationship and pointed out the analogy with the flexion reflex of the dog that had been extensively studied by Sherrington; the toe “extensors” shorten the leg and therefore they are flexors in a physiological sense. The normal (downward) toe response of the toes does not belong to a more complex movement, although Babinski originally believed this; it is a monosegmental skin reflex, akin to abdominal reflexes. Babinski correctly predicted that dysfunction of the pyramidal tract is not synonymous with a lesion, and that this dysfunction of the pyramidal system is necessary but not sufficient to produce aphénomène des orteils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acchiote P (1911) Extension continue du gros orteil, signe de l'irritation permanente du faisceau pyramidal. Rev Neurol (Paris) 22;712–713

    Google Scholar 

  2. Austregesilo A, Esposel F (1912) Le phenomene de Babinski, provoque par l'excitation de la cuisse. Encéphale 7;429–436

    Google Scholar 

  3. Babinski J (1885) Ètude anatomique et clinique sur la sclérose en plaques. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  4. Babinski J (1896) Sur le réflexe cutané plantaire dans certaines affections organiques du systeme nerveux central. C R Soc Biol 48;207–208

    Google Scholar 

  5. Babinski J (1896) Relachement des muscles dans l'hémiplégie organique. C R Soc Biol 48:471–472

    Google Scholar 

  6. Babinski J (1897) Discussion, Congrès International de Neurologie. Bull Med 11;896

    Google Scholar 

  7. Babinski J (1898) Du phénomène des orteils et de sa valeur sémiologique. Sem Med 18;321–322

    Google Scholar 

  8. Babinski J (1988) Sur une forme de paraplégie spasmodique consécutive a une lesion organique et sans dégéneration du système pyramidal. Bull Soc Méd Hôp 16;342–358

    Google Scholar 

  9. Babinski J (1900) Diagnostic différentiel de l'hémiplégie organique et de l'hémiplégie hystérique. Gaz Hôp 73;521–527

    Google Scholar 

  10. Babinski J (1902) Discussion, Société de Neurologie. Rev Neurol (Paris) 10;1176

    Google Scholar 

  11. Babinski J (1903) De l'abduction des orteils (signe de l'éventail). Rev Neurol (Paris) 11;1205–1206

    Google Scholar 

  12. Babinski J (1903) De l'abduction des orteils. Rev Neurol (Paris) 11;728–729

    Google Scholar 

  13. Babinski J (1907) Sur le réflexe cutane plantaire. Rev Neurol (Paris) 15 755

    Google Scholar 

  14. Babinski J (1911) Paraplégie spasmodique organique avec contracture en flexion et contractions musculaires involontaires. Rev Neurol (Paris) 21 132–136

    Google Scholar 

  15. Babinski J (1922) Réflexes de dèfense. Brain 45;149–184

    Google Scholar 

  16. Babinski J (1924) Discussion, Société de Neurologie. Rev Neurol (Paris) 41;813

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barré J-A, Morin P (1921) Sur quelques modalités de réflexe cutané plantaire et sur sa participation au régime des réflexes cutanés. Gaz Hôp 94;1501–1503

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bechterew W (1904) Über einen besonderen Beugereflex der Zehen. Neurol Centralbl 23;609–610

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bechterew W (1906) Ueber eine eigentümliche Reflexerscheinung bei Plantarflexion des Fu\es und der Zehen in Fällen von Affektion des centralen motorischen Neurons. Neurol Centralbl 25;290–291

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20. Blocq J, Onanoff J (1892) Séméiologie et diagnostic des maladies nerveuses. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brown-Séquard E (1868) Sur l'arrêt immédiat de convulsions violentes par l'influence de l'irritation de quelques nerfs sensitifs. Arch Physiol Norm Pathol 1;156–160

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chaddock CG (1911) A preliminary communication concerning a new diagnostic nervous sign. Interstate Med J 18;742–746

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cohn M (1899) Ueber die Bedeutung der Zehenreflexe. Neurol Centralbl 13;580–585

    Google Scholar 

  24. Collier J (1899) An investigation upon the plantar reflex, with reference to the significance of its variations under pathological conditions, including an enquiry into the aetiology of acquired pes cavus. Brain 22;71–99

    Google Scholar 

  25. Crafts LM (1919) An original test for the pathologic great toe sign. JAMA 73;265–267

    Google Scholar 

  26. Critchley M (1931) The neurology of old age. Lancet 1;1221–1230

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dietrich HF (1957) A longitudinal study of the Babinski and plantar grasp reflexes in infancy. Am J Dis Child 94;265–271

    Google Scholar 

  28. Drobný M, Fundárek J (1976) Analysis of reflex responses on applying new ways in inducing the Babinski reflex (in Czech). Bratisl Lek Listy 66;386–395

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Drobný M, Pitha V, FundArek J (1966) New ways in producing the Babinski reflex — electromyographic study (in Czech). Bratisl Lek Listy 66;386–395

    Google Scholar 

  30. Erb W (1875) Ueber Sehnenreflexe bei Gesunden und bei Rückenmarkskranken. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 5 792–802

    Google Scholar 

  31. Estanol B (1983) Temporal course of the threshold and size of the receptive field of the Babinski sign. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46;1055–1057

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fearing F (1930) Reflex action — a study in the history of physiological physiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  33. Geigel R (1892) Die klinische Prüfung der Hautreflexe. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 18;166–167

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gonda VE (1942) A new tendon stretch reflex — its significance in lesions of the pyramidal tracts. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 8;531–537

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gordon A (1904) A new reflex: paradoxic flexor reflex — its diagnostic value. Am Med 8;971

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gordon A (1904) Réflexe paradoxal des fléxisseurs. Leurs relations avec le réflexe patellaire et le phénomène de Babinski. Rev Neurol (Paris) 12:1083–1084

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gowers WR (1892) A manual of diseases of the nervous system, 2nd edn. Churchill, London

    Google Scholar 

  38. Grigorescu D (1941) Ein neues pyramidales Zeichen (abstract from original article in Rumanian: Spital 1940; 60:289–316). Zentralbl Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr 98:667

    Google Scholar 

  39. Grimby L (1963) Normal plantar response: integration of flexor and extensor reflex components. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 26:29–50

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grimby L (1963) Pathological plantar response: disturbances of the normal integration of flexor and extensor components. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 26:314–321

    Google Scholar 

  41. Grimby L (1965) Pathological plantar response. I. Flexor and extensor components in early and late reflex parts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 28 469–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Grimby L (1965) Pathological plantar response. II. Loss of significance of stimulus site. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 28:476–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hindfelt B, Rosén I, Hanko J (1976) The significance of a crossed extensor hallucis response in neurological disorders: a comparison with the Babinski sign. Acta Neurol Scand 53;241–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hirschberg R, Rose F (1904) Contributions à l'étude du réflexe adducteur du pied. Rev Neurol (Paris) 12:91–94

    Google Scholar 

  45. Iragui VJ (1986) The Charcot-Bouchard controversy. Arch Neurol 43 290–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jakobsohn L, Caro A (1912) Über einen neuen, von der planta pedis auslosbaren Reflex. Neurol Centralbl 31:420–421

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jastrowitz M (1875) Beitrag zur Pathologie der Hemiplegien. Berl Klin Wochenschr 12:428–430

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kalischer O (1899) Ueber den normalen und pathologischen Zehenreflex. Arch Pathol Anat 155:486–506

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kaye JA, Oken BS, Howieson DB, Howieson J, Holm LA, Dennison K (1994) Neurologic evaluation of the optimally healthy oldest old. Arch Neurol 51:1205–1211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kugelberg E, Eklund K, Grimby L (1960) An electromyographic study of the nociceptive reflexes of the lower limb. Mechanism of the plantar responses. Brain 83:394–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Landau WM, Clare MH (1959) The plantar reflex in man, with special reference to some conditions where the extensor response is unexpectedly absent. Brain 82:321–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lenggenhager K (1945) Ueber einen neuen, sehr empfindlichen Reflex bei Druck auf die motorischen Bahnen im Zentralnervensystem. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr 75:693–694

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lewy FH (1909) Das Babinskische und verwandte Phänomene. Monatsschr Psychiatr Neurol 25:55–70

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lichtmann E (1941) A modified Babinski reflex (Babinski reflex). J Nerv Ment Dis 93:451–152

    Google Scholar 

  55. Marie P, Foix C (1910) Sur le retrait réflexe du membre inférieur provoqué par la flexion forcée des orteils. Rev Neurol (Paris) 20:121–123

    Google Scholar 

  56. Marie P, Foix C (1912) Les réflexes d'automatisme médullaire et le phénomène des raccourcisseurs; leur valuer sémiologique, leur signification physiologique. Rev Neurol (Paris) 23:657–676

    Google Scholar 

  57. Marie P, Foix C (1913) Réflexes d'automatisme médullaire et réflexes dits 'de défense': le phénomène des raccourcisseurs. Sem Med 33:505–508

    Google Scholar 

  58. Marie P, Foix C (1915) Les réflexes d'automatisme dits de défense. Rev Neurol (Paris) 28:225–236

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mendel K (1904) Ein Reflex am Fussrücken. Neurol Centralbl 23:197–198

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mendel K (1904) Bemerkungen zur vorstehenden Mitteilung. Neurol Centralbl 23:610–611

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mendel K (1906) Cher den Fußrück-enreflex. Neurol Centralbl 25:293–297

    Google Scholar 

  62. Minkowski M (1923) Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte, Lokalisation und Klinik des Fusssohlenreflexes. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr 13:475–514

    Google Scholar 

  63. Moniz E (1916) Le signe de la flexion plantaire du gros orteil avec la jambe en flexion. Rev Neurol (Paris) 30:173–176

    Google Scholar 

  64. Nakanishi T, Shimada Y, Toyokura Y (1974) An electromyographic study of the pathological plantar response. J Neurol Sci 23:71–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nathan PW (1994) Effects on movement of surgical incisions into the human spinal cord. Brain 117:337–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Nathan PW, Smith MC (1955) The Babinski response: a review and new observations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 18:250–259

    Google Scholar 

  67. Noica D, Sakelaru (1906) Le réflexe plantaire et le phénomène des orteils (signe de Babinski) au point de vue physiologique et physio-pathologique. Sem Med 26:601–602

    Google Scholar 

  68. Oppenheim H (1899) Discussion following W. Koenig (1899). Berl Klin Wochenschr 36:822–823

    Google Scholar 

  69. Oppenheim H (1902) Zur Pathologie der Hautreflexe an den unteren Extremitäten. Monatsschr Psychiatr Neurol 12:518–530

    Google Scholar 

  70. Porter R (1993) The rise of physical examination. In: Bynum WF, Porter R (eds) Medicine and the five senses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 179–197

    Google Scholar 

  71. Puusepp L (1923) Sur un nouveau réflexe du petit orteil. Presse Med 31:1003

    Google Scholar 

  72. Puusepp L (1924) La question de la localisation du signe du petit orteil par les cas de tumeurs du corps strié. Rev Neurol (Paris) 41:812–813

    Google Scholar 

  73. Remak E (1893) Zur Localisation der spinalen Hautreflexe der Unterextremitäten. Neurol Centralbl 12:506–512

    Google Scholar 

  74. Remak E (1899) Discussion following W. Koenig (1899) Berl Klin Wochenschr 36:823

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ritter G (1967) Historische Bemerkungen zum sogenannten Babinskischen Phänomen. J Neurol Sci 5:1–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Roch, Crouzon O (1928) Le phénomène des orteils provoqué par friction du dos du pied. Rev Neurol (Paris) 49:120

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rosenbach O (1876) Ein Beitrag zur Symptomatologie cerebraler Hemiplegieen. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 6:845–851

    Google Scholar 

  78. Rossolimo G (1902) Le réflexe profond du gros orteil. Rev Neurol (Paris) 10:723–724

    Google Scholar 

  79. Schaefer (1899) Ueber einen antagonistischen Reflex. Neurol Centralbl 18:1016–1018

    Google Scholar 

  80. Schoch EO (1967) Die Fußsohlenre-flexe in anthropologisch-medizinischer Sicht. Nervenarzt 35:420–421

    Google Scholar 

  81. Schwarz A (1882) Zur Lehre von den Haut- und Sehnenreflexen. Arch Psychiat Nervenkr 13:621–657

    Google Scholar 

  82. Sicard J-A (1911) Extension continue du gros orteil — signe de réaction pyramidale. Rev Neurol (Paris) 22:405–407

    Google Scholar 

  83. Sinkler W (1888) The toe reflex. Med News 53:611–612

    Google Scholar 

  84. Smith MS (1979) Babinski's sign — abduction also counts (letter). Arch Neurol 242:1849–1850

    Google Scholar 

  85. Specht W (1902) Beitrag zur klinischen Bedeutung und Pathogenese des Babinski'schen Reflexes. Monatsschr Psychiatr Neurol 13:81–96

    Google Scholar 

  86. Stransky E (1933) Eine Abart des Babinskischen Reflexes. Nervenarzt 6:596

    Google Scholar 

  87. Strümpell A (1880) Beiträge zur Pathologie des Rückenmarks. Ueber kombinierte Systemerkrankungen im Rückenmark. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 11:27–74

    Google Scholar 

  88. Strümpell A (1899) Zur Kenntnis der Haut- und Sehnenreflexe bei Nervenkranken. Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd 15:254–273

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tarlau M (1989) The extensor toe reflex. Arch Neurol 46:1047

    Google Scholar 

  90. Tashiro K (1986) Reversed Chaddock method: a new method to elicit the upgoing great toe. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:1321

    Google Scholar 

  91. Throckmorton TB (1911) A new method for eliciting the extensor toe reflex. JAMA 56:1311–1312

    Google Scholar 

  92. Trömner E (1911) Ueber Modifikationen des Babinski- und OppenheimReflexes und ein neues Fu\phänomen (Wadenphänomen). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 37:1700–1702

    Google Scholar 

  93. Van Gehuchten A (1898) Le phénomène des orteils. J de Neurol 3:153–155

    Google Scholar 

  94. Van Gehuchten A (1898) A propos du phenomene des orteils. J de Neurol 3:284–286

    Google Scholar 

  95. Van Gehuchten A (1900) Réflexes cutanés et réflexes tendineux (XIII Congres International de Medecine). Rev Neurol (Paris) 8:736–739

    Google Scholar 

  96. Van Gijn J (1975) Babinski response: stimulus and effector. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:180–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Van Gijn J (1978) The Babinski sign and the pyramidal syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41:865–873

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Van Gijn J (1995) The Babinski reflex. Postgrad Med J 71:645–648

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Van Gijn J (1996) The Babinski sign — a centenary. University of Utrecht, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  100. Van Gijn J, Bonke B (1977) Interpretation of plantar reflexes: biasing effect of other signs and symptoms. JNeurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:787–789

    Google Scholar 

  101. Van Thanh L (1973) Modification of the Babinski phenomenon (in Czech). Ceskoslov Neurol Neurochir 36:399–402

    Google Scholar 

  102. Von Monakow C (1909) Über den äusseren und den inneren ‘Fubrandreflex’. Neurol Centralbl 28:671

    Google Scholar 

  103. Walshe FMR (1914) The physiological significance of the reflex phenomena in spastic paralysis of the lower limbs. Brain 37:269–336

    Google Scholar 

  104. Walshe FMR (1956) The Babinski plantar response, its forms, and its physiological and pathological significance. Brain 79:529–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Wernicke C (1881) Lehrbuch der Gehirnkrankheiten. Fischer, Kassel

    Google Scholar 

  106. Westphal C (1875) Ueber einige Bewegungs-Erscheinungen an gehihmten Gliedern. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 5:803–834

    Google Scholar 

  107. Wilkins RH, Brody IA (1967) Babinski's sign. Arch Neurol 17:441–451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Gijn, J. The Babinski sign: The first hundred years. J Neurol 243, 675–683 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873972

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873972

Key words

Navigation