Abstract
The influence of patient-related factors on inter-observer variability in the evaluation of neurological signs was investigated. Two hundred and two consecutive unselected inpatients were examined by two senior neurologists who were unaware of the neurological case history. Eight signs were evaluated: anisocoria, jerky eye movements, facial palsy, difference in elbow extension force, abnormal finger-nose test, Barré sign, difference in knee jerk, and extensor plantar reflex. Agreement rates were calculated in order to compare the inter-observer variability with reference to the patients' sex, age, mode of admission, and diagnosis at discharge. Observed agreement rates for the eight examined signs only sporadically showed statistically significant differences between the chosen patient-related factors. In general, inter-observer variation does not appear to be influenced by the sex, age, mode of admission or diagnosis at discharge of the patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington DC, pp 261–264
Bickerstaff ER (1975) Neurological examination in clinical practice, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 199–203
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (1980) Clinical disagreement. I. How often it occurs and why. Can Med Assoc J 123:499–504
Gjørup T (1988) The kappa coefficient and the prevalence of a diagnosis. Methods Inf Med 27:184–186
Ker M (1991) Issues in the use of kappa. Invest Radiol 26:78–83
Lindsay KW, Teasdale GM, Knill-Jones RP (1983) Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 58:57–62
Mayo NE, Sullivan SJ, Swaine B (1991) Observer variation in assessing neurophysical signs among patients with head injuries. Am J Med Rehabil 70:118–123
Shinar D, Gross CR, Mohr JP, Caplan LR, Price TR, Wolf PA, Hier DB, Kase CS, Fishman IG, Wolf CL, Kunitz SC (1985) Interobserver variability in the assessment of history and examination in the Stroke Data Bank. Arch Neurol 42:557–565
Siegel S, Castellan N (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral science. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 284–291
Sisk C, Ziegler DK, Zileli T (1970) Discrepancies in recorded results from duplicate neurological history and examination in patients studied for prognosis in cerebrovascular disease. Stroke I:14–18
Swaine BR, Sullivan SJ (1993) Reliability of the scores for the finger-tonose test in adults with traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther 73:71–78
Teasdale G, Knill-Jones R, Van Der Sande J (1978) Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41:603–610
Thompson WD, Walter SD (1988) Variance and dissent. A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient. J Clin Epidemiol 41:949–958
Tomasello F, Mariani F, Fieschi C, Argentino C, Bono G, De Zanche L, Inzitari D, Martini A, Perrone P, Sangiovanni G (1982) Assessment of inter-observer differences in the Italian Multicenter study on reversible cerebral ischemia. Stroke 13:32–35
Van Den Berge JH, Schouten HJA, Boomstra S, Van Drunen Littel S, Braakmann R (1979) Interobserver agreement in assessment of ocular signs in coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 42:1163–1168
Walton J (1985) Brains disease of the nervous system, 9th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, M., Christensen, P.B., Sindrup, S.H. et al. Inter-observer variation in the evaluation of neurological signs: Patient-related factors. J Neurol 241, 492–496 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919711
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919711