Skip to main content
Log in

The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson's disease

Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parkinson's disease is a common degenerative neurological condition. A number of general health status measures exist but these may not address areas salient to specific diseases. We report here the development and validation of a short 39 item health status questionnaire for use in Parkinson's disease. Questionnaire items, generated from indepth interviews with people with Parkinson's disease, were developed into a 65 item questionnaire. Data from a postal survey using the 65 item questionnaire were statistically analysed to produce a shorter questionnaire with 39 items and eight scales addressing different dimensions of Parkinson's disease. A second postal survey was conducted in order to assess the reliability and validity of the new 39 item questionnaire. The final questionnaire, referred to here as the 39 item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), proved to have satisfactory internal and test-retest reliability, and construct validity in relation to other measures, reported by respondents with Parkinson's disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sutcliffe R, Prior R, Mawby B, McQillan W. Parkinson's disease in the district of Northampton Health Authority, United Kingdom. A study of prevalence and disability.Acta Neurol Scand 1985;72: 363–379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ware J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36 item short form health survey 1: conceptual framework and item selection.Med Care 1992;30: 437–483.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A.Quality of life measurement in health care. A review of measures and population norms for the UK SF-36. Oxford, Health Services Research Unit, Oxford University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patrick D, Deyo R. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.Med Care 1989;suppl 27: 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D. Measuring health-related quality of life.Ann Intern Med 1993;118: 622–629.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1951;16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nunnally JC.Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. New York; McGraw, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liang MH, Larson MG, Cullen KE, Schwartz JA. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.Arthritis Rheum 1985;28: 542–547.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoehn M, Yahr M. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality.Neurology 1967;17: 427–442.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulpitt C, Shaw K, Clifton P, Stern G, Davies J, Reid J. The symptoms of patients treated for Parkinson's disease.Clin Neuropharmacol 1985;8: 175–183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mutch W, Strudwick A, Roy S, Downie A. Parkinson's disease: disability, review and management.Br Med J 1986;293: 675–677.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shindler J, Brown R, Welburn P, Parkes J. Measuring the quality of life of patients with Parkinson's disease. In: Walker S, Rosser R (eds)Quality of Life: Assessment and Applications Lancaster: MTP Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Welburn P, Walker S. Assessment of quality of life in Parkinson's disease. In Teeling Smith G (ed)Measuring Health: A Practical Approach. London: Wiley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kennard C, Munro A, Park D. The reliability of assessment of Parkinson's disease.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1984;47: 322–323.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson L, Kennard C, Crawford T, et al. Scales for rating motor impairment in Parkinson's disease: studies of reliability and convergent validity.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1991;54: 18–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hely M, Wilson A, Williamson P, O'Sullivan D, Rail D, Morris G. Reliability of the Columbia Scale for assessing signs of Parkinson's disease.Movement Disorders 1993;8: 466–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gothan A, Brown R, Marsden C. Depression in Parkinson's disease: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1986;49: 381–389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown R, MacCarthy B, Jahanshahi M, Marsden D. Accuracy of self-reported disability in patients with Parkinsonism.Arch Neurol 1989;46: 955–959.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dakof G, Mendelsohn G. Patterns of adaptation to Parkinson's disease.Health Psychol 1989;8: 355–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Busenbark KL, Nash J, Nash S, Hubble JP, Koller WC. Is essential tremor benign?Neurology 1991;41: 1982–1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Longstreth WTJr, Nelson L, Linde M, Munoz D. Utility of the Sickness Impact Profile in Parkinson's disease.J Geriat Psych Neurol 1992;5: 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singer E. Social costs of Parkinson's disease.J Chronic Dis 1973;26: 243–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Calne D. Treatment of Parkinson's disease.New Engl J Med 1993;329: 1021–1027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pentland B, Findley L, Oxtoby M, Pearce V, Quinn N, Scott S. Parkinson's disease: the spectrum of disabilities.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1992;55 (Suppl): 32–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hopkins A. Clinical audit and neurology.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1992;55 (Suppl): 19–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peto, V., Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R. et al. The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson's disease. Qual Life Res 4, 241–248 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02260863

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02260863

Key words

Navigation