Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes after shunt implantation and adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

We have previously reported that the intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes were elevated in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients responding to shunt surgery. Whether or not shunt implantation or adjustment of the shunt valve opening pressure modifies the intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes in NPH patients remains to be established. This report summarises our observations.

Patients and methods

Thirteen patients with NPH (idiopathic in nine and secondary in four) are presented in whom continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring was done before and after shunt implantation. In two, ICP monitoring was also done during adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure. The mean ICP and mean ICP wave amplitude (i.e. pulse pressure amplitudes) were determined in 6-s time windows.

Results

After shunt implantation there was a fall in both mean ICP and mean ICP wave amplitude; the reduction in the two ICP parameters correlated significantly. However, mean ICP in the supine position was normal (i.e. <15 mmHg) in 12 of 13 patients before shunt placement, and remained normal after shunting. According to our criteria, the mean ICP wave amplitudes were elevated before shunting in 12 of 13 patients and became “normalised” the day after shunting in nine patients. The reduction in mean ICP wave amplitude after shunt was highly significant at the group level. Moreover, adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure modified the levels of mean ICP wave amplitudes.

Conclusions

The present observations in 13 NPH patients indicate that shunt implantation reduces mean ICP wave amplitudes. Moreover, the level of reduction can be tailored by adjustment of the shunt valve opening pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergsneider M (2000) Management of hydrocephalus with programmable valves after traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Curr Opinion Neurol 13:661–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergsneider M, Yang I, Hu X, McArthur DL, Cook SW, Boscardin WJ (2004) Relationship between valve opening pressure, body position, and intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus: paradigm for selection of programmable valve pressure setting. Neurosurgery 55:851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boon AJW, Tans JTJ, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HAL, Avezaat CJJ, deJong DA, Gooskens RHJM, Hermans J (1998) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: randomised comparison of low- and medium-pressure shunts. J Neurosurg 88:490–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook SW, Bergsneider M (2002) Why valve opening pressure plays a relatively minor role in the postural ICP response to ventricular shunts in normal pressure hydrocephalus: modelling and implications. Acta Neurochir Suppl 81:15–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Czosnyka M, Pickard JD (2004) Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:813–821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eide PK (2003) Quantitative analysis of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in symptomatic patients with extracranial shunts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:231–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eide PK (2006) A new method for processing of continuous intracranial pressure signals. Med Eng Phys 28:579–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eide PK (2006) Intracranial pressure parameters in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:21–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eide PK, Brean A (2006) Intracranial pulse pressure amplitude levels determined during pre-operative assessment of subjects with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:1151–1156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eide PK, Fremming AD (2003) Lack of relationship between resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow and intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 108:381–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Malm J, Kristensen B, Fagerlund M, Koskinen L-O, Ekstedt J (1995) Cerebrospinal fluid shunt dynamics in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 58:715–723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sorteberg A, Eide PK, Fremming A (2004) A prospective study on the clinical effect of surgical treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus: the value of hydrodynamic evaluation. Br J Neurosurg 18:149–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zemack G, Romner B (2000) Seven years of clinical experience with the programmable Codman Hakim valve: a retrospective study of 583 patients. J Neurosurg 92:941–948

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zemack G, Romner B (2002) Adjustable valves in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a retrospective study of 218 patients. Neurosurgery 51:1392–1402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Kristian Eide.

Additional information

Comments

This paper describes further work from this group on the puslatility of the ICP waveform in patients who either have, or may benefit from, a shunt.

Previously they have shown that higher ICP pulse pressure amplitudes may be a useful index for positive shunt response.

This study addressed the question of whether shunt implantation reduces pre- pulse pressure amplitude. Although the numbers in this study are small this does appear to the case even whilst the mean value of ICP remained within normal range throughout.

This methodology appears to give useful clinical information. In comparison to other methods, such as B wave analysis, implementation is simpler and therefore there may be greater potential to have such monitoring and analysis in real time at the bedside.

As the authors point out the goal of finding the optimal shunt valve opening pressure is still elusive. The production of intelligent shunts where not only the opening pressure can be altered but also the ICP waveform externally measured and monitored should improve the way patients with hydrocephalus are managed.

Iain Chambers

The James Cook University Hospital

ICP monitoring and measurement of the mean ICP wave amplitude was performed in 13 patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus before and one day after shunting. As one would expect shunting resulted in a reduction of both ICP and ICP wave amplitude. No relation was found, however, with clinical improvement. As clinical improvement may take weeks or months such a relation was not very likely. Therefore, leaving a pressure transducer inside one day after shunting does not seem useful in clinical practise.More interesting were the results of measuring ICP and wave amplitude during adjustments of the valve opening pressure. By gradual lowering of this opening pressure first a reduction of both parameters was seen later followed by diverging changes of mean ICP and mean ICP wave amplitude permitting fine tuning of the valve opening pressure and clinical improvement. Here the availability of continuous online data is advantage compared to measurement of CSF outflow resistance by an infusion test.

Jos Th J Tans

Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eide, P.K., Sorteberg, W. Changes in intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes after shunt implantation and adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150, 1141–1147 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0138-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0138-8

Keywords

Navigation