Direct excitation of neck flexor motoneurons by the interstitiospinal tract

In the last two decades, we have focused on establishing a reliable technique for focal stimulation of vestibular receptors to evaluate neural connectivity. Here, we summarize the vestibular-related neuronal circuits for the vestibulo-ocular reflex, vestibulocollic reflex, and vestibulospinal reflex arcs. The focal stimulating technique also uncovered some hidden neural mechanisms. In the otolith system, we identified two hidden neural mechanisms that enhance otolith receptor sensitivity. The first is commissural inhibition, which boosts sensitivity by incorporating inputs from bilateral otolith receptors, the existence of which was in contradiction to the classical understanding of the otolith system but was observed in the utricular system. The second mechanism, cross-striolar inhibition, intensifies the sensitivity of inputs from both sides of receptive cells across the striola in a single otolith sensor. This was an entirely novel finding and is typically observed in the saccular system. We discuss the possible functional meaning of commissural and cross-striolar inhibition. Finally, our focal stimulating technique was applied to elucidate the different constructions of axonal projections from each vestibular receptor to the spinal cord. We also discuss the possible function of the unique neural connectivity observed in each vestibular receptor system.

Lateral eye, head, and body movements are produced by electrical stimulation of many brain regions from frontal cortex to pons^15,115,298. A new collision method shows that at least 5 separate axon bundles mediate stimulation-elicited lateral head and body movements in rats. One bundle passes between the rostromedial tegmentum and medial pons, with conduction velocities of 0.8–18 m/s. A second bundle passes between the superior colliculus and contralateral medial pons, with conduction velocities of 1.7–13 m/s. A third bundle passes between the superior colliculus and ventrolateral pons, with conduction velocities of 1.3–20 m/s. A fourth bundle passes between the internal capsule and medial substantia nigra, with conduction velocities of 0.9–4.4 m/s. A fifth bundle passes between the anteromedial cortex and rostral striatum, with conduction velocities of 2.4–36 m/s. Collision effects have not been observed between the anteromedial cortex and the internal capsule, medial substantia nigra, superior colliculus, rostromedial tegmentum, or medial pons, which suggests that these sites are not connected by axons mediating turning. Possible synaptic linkages between the 5 bundles and possible transmitters are discussed.

Ipsiversive circliig results from stimulation of the rostromedial tegmentum (RMT) or medial pons (PONS), and contraversive circling results from stimulation of the superior colliculus (SC). To determine whether these sites are functionally connected, the collision method of Shizgal, Bielajew, Corbett, Skelton and Yeomans (1980) was used in rats. Pairs of stimulation pulses were presented to two sites, and the degree of collision between stimulation-evoked action potentials was assessed by measuring the frequency required for circling at short and long intrapair conditioning-testing (C-T) intervals. Collision was evidenced when the required frequencies were higher at short C-T intervals than at long C-T intervals. Collision of 46–62% was observed between RMT and PONS, and collision of 15–29% was observed between SC and PONS. Sites from which collision was obtained were located along the trajectories of the medial tegmental tract and the crossed tectospinal pathway. Refractory periods in all sites were similar, ranging from 0.3 to 1.7 ms. Conduction velocities of axons connecting RMT and PONS and SC and PONS were comparable, ranging from 0.8 to 13.3 m/s and 1.7 to 13.8 m/s, respectively, with lower conduction velocities associated with more ventral pontine sites. Thus, RMT and PONS, and SC and PONS are connected by myelinated axons that mediate circling.

Experiments were performed to study the projection of the group y of the vestibular nuclei and the dentate and fastigial nuclei of the cerebellum to the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC) in cats by using retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and electrophysiological methods; and to study the vestibular responses of such projection neurons. Following injections of HRP into the unilateral INC, with partial involvement of the surrounding reticular formation, including the nucleus of Darkschewitsch (ND), many retrogradely labeled neurons were found in the dorsal part of the group y nucleus contralateral to the injection site. Labeled cells were also seen in the contralateral dentate nucleus, frequently in its caudal-ventral part, and in the contralateral fastigial nucleus at all rostrocaudal levels, but most frequently in its caudal part. In electrophysiological experiments performed on cats anesthetized with α-chloralose or N₂O and paralyzed with gallamine, group y, dentate and fastigial nuclei neurons were antidromically activated by weak stimuli that were confined to the contralateral INC. Depth-threshold curves for antidromic activation of such neurons revealed that the lowest threshold points were within the INC, but not in the ND. The INC-projecting neurons in the group y and dentate nuclei did not respond to electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral or contralateral vestibular nerve, indicating that they do not receive direct labyrinthine inputs. On the contrary, many fastigial neurons projecting to the INC responded to labyrinthine stimulation, suggesting that they may be involved in the vestibular reflexes. These results suggest a difference in properties of INC-projecting neurons in these nuclei.