Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 616, Issues 1–2, 9 July 1993, Pages 30-38
Brain Research

Task constraints on foot movement and the incidence of compensatory stepping following perturbation of upright stance

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(93)90188-SGet rights and content

Abstract

Our understanding of the postural control responses in the event of external perturbation has focused almost exclusively on the early automatic adjustments. The present study addresses another postural reaction that is functionally important: compensatory stepping. The purpose was to identify the relative importance by comparing the prevalence of compensatory stepping with and without instructions constraining the subjects' responses. Subjects stood on two force plates which were mounted on a “moveable” platform. Their posture was perturbed by the translation of the platform either forward or backward at various accelerations. Following a practice period, seven subjects each performed under two different tasks: “constrained” (keep feet in place) and “unconstrained” (no specific instructions given). The primary focus of the analysis was on responses to forward platform translations. Analysis revealed that the frequency of stepping tended to be higher in “unconstrained”, as opposed to “constrained”, tasks. The frequency of stepping was also related to the interaction between the tasks and the order in which they were given. Specifically, subjects stepped most frequently when they received the “unconstrained” task first. The frequency of stepping also increased as the magnitude of the platform acceleration increased. Time of onset of stepping, as defined from the force plate measures, began as early as 160 ms in one subject and averaged 250 ms across all subjects. These relatively fast response times suggest that step initiation often occurs well before the limits of stability are reached. A novel and unexpected finding was the identification of a third response type, intermediate to stepping and (bilaterally symmetrical) non-stepping responses. This intermediate response was characterized by a lateral weight shift and appeared to be the initiation of a stepping response which was aborted before the foot was lifted. In summary, it is concluded that stepping may be more prevalent in unconstrained behaviour. Paradigms that implicity or explicity constrain foot movement may well lead to misleading conclusions regarding ecologic validity of specific postural strategies. The occurrence of stepping is also strongly influenced by the magnitude of the perturbation, implying that some “decision” process occurs before initiation of stepping. Moreover, initiation of compensatory stepping (lateral weight shift) and continuation (foot lift and swing) may involve separate and sequential “decisions”, suggesting a more complex contribution from sensory cues than might be predicted for a completely preplanned reaction.

Reference (22)

  • HansenP.D. et al.

    Postural responses to changing task conditions

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (113)

    • Compensatory postural responses to backward loss of balance in patients with cerebellar disease

      2021, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      The capacity to perceive the onset of body instability and to execute rapid and coordinated motor responses are important to prevent falls. One critical factor in coping with sudden loss of balance is to make appropriate compensatory step reactions when responding to instability (e.g., balance perturbation) [7,8]. Especially the characteristics of the first step in avoiding falls are important for regaining balance suitably [9,10].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text