The human operator as a servo system element☆
References (36)
- et al.
Dynamic Response of Human Operators
WADC TR 56-524
(1957) The Human Pilot
- et al.
The Human as a Dual Mode Relay Servomechanism
- et al.
Nonlinear Techniques for Studying Human Operator Performance
The Phase-Plane as a Tool for the Study of Human Behavior in Tracking Problems
WADC TR 55-444
(1955)A Nonlinear Approach to Human Tracking
Franklin Institute Report I-2490-1, Contract Nav 1571(00)
(1955)Combination Open-Cycle, Closed-Cycle System
- et al.
Introduction to Nonlinear Mechanics
(1943) The Analysis of Nonlinear Control Systems with Random Inputs
Nonlinear Control Systems with Random Inputs
Trans. IRE PGCT
(1954)
Power Spectral Methods of Analysis and Their Application to Problems in Airplane Dynamics
AGARD Flight Test Manual
(1956)
Theory of Servomechanisms
(1947)
Tracking Response Characteristics of the Human Operator
Human Factors Operation Research Laboratories Report HFORL Memo No. 40
(1953)
Characteristics of Simple Manual Control Systems
Characteristics of the Human as a Linear Servo-Element
Interim Report on Human Frequency Response Studies
WADC TR 54-370
(1954)
The Nature of the Operator's Response in Manual Control and Its Implications for Controller Design
J. Inst. Elec. Engrs.
(1947)
Cited by (77)
The impact of static output nonlinearities on the control strategies that humans use in command-following tasks
2021, Journal of the Franklin InstituteUnderstanding purposeful systems: the application of control theory in engineering and psychology
2020, The Interdisciplinary Handbook of Perceptual Control Theory: Living Control Systems IVA Data-Driven Path-Tracking Model Based on Visual Perception Behavior Analysis and ANFIS Method
2024, Electronics (Switzerland)Time Delay Mitigation in Aerial Telerobotic Operations Using Heterogeneous Stereo-Vision Systems
2023, Journal of Aerospace Information SystemsRider control identification in cycling taking into account steering torque feedback and sensory delays
2023, Vehicle System Dynamics
- ☆
This research was supported in whole or in part by the United States Air Force under Contracts AF 33(616)-3080, AF 33(038)-10420, AF 33(616)-2804, AF 33(616)-3610, and AF 33(616)-5822, monitored jointly by the Flight Control Laboratory and the Aero Medical Laboratory, Wright Air Development Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
- 1
Systems Technology, Inc., Inglewood, Calif.
- 2
The Franklin Institute Laboratories for Research and Development, Philadelphia, Pa.
Copyright © 1959 Published by Elsevier Ltd.