Elsevier

Injury

Volume 27, Issue 3, April 1996, Pages 159-161
Injury

Paper
Admission after head injury: how many occur and how many are recorded?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)00217-0Get rights and content

Abstract

This study attempted to determine how many patients admitted with a head injury do not have the diagnosis recorded in the medical notes, and the factors associated with this failure. This observational study took place over four weeks with a review of notes of all patients in the trauma service admission wards in a District and Teaching hospital. All patients aged 16 years to 65 years admitted to the inpatient trauma wards were included, and the frequency of diagnosis of head injury made by the investigator was compared with the frequency of a recorded diagnosis of head injury in the notes. Of 107 patients admitted 47 had had a head injury; 24 did not have the diagnosis recorded, and four of these had moderate or severe injuries. A failure to record diagnosis was more likely in the presence of other more severe injuries (2128), and in patients with minor or trivial injuries (2030). We conclude that head injury registers are likely to miss a significant number of patients admitted to hospital unless specific attempts are made to identify and record the diagnosis.

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (39)

  • Examples in biomechanics

    2018, Engineering Standards for Forensic Application
  • Traumatic brain injury and aggression: A systematic review and future directions using community samples

    2017, Aggression and Violent Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    Boswell et al. (2002), for instance, found that among adults who presented to the ED, 39% self-reported that they had not sought medical treatment for a previous mTBI/concussion, with 36% of this group reporting that their previous injury involved loss of consciousness (LOC). Additional research has reported that some mTBIs/concussions presenting to hospitals are not recorded (Moss & Wade, 1996), particularly if these injuries were considered minor or occurred concurrently with other more serious injuries. To date much of the research examining associations between aggression and TBI has not used community samples and has instead used samples from populations such as those who have had contact with the criminal justice system and those who are recruited through hospitals or clinical settings.

  • Long-term functional outcomes of traumatic brain injury

    2015, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    See the introduction to this volume for a definition of TBI. It should be noted that there is as yet no gold standard measure of TBI across the full severity range, and TBIs are frequently miscoded even among hospitalized patients (Moss and Wade, 1996; Bazarian et al., 2006). Frequent miscoding and underreporting of mild TBIs (McCrea et al., 2004) of TBIs and TBI severity undoubtedly results in mischaracterization of the association between TBI and TBI severity and long-term outcomes.

  • Mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis frequently remains unrecorded in subjects with craniofacial fractures

    2012, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    According to earlier studies, the accuracy of diagnosing mild TBI at emergency departments is not good. Moss and Wade reported a failure to record TBI among 24/47 head injured subjects (51%) in a District and Teaching hospital.15 Four of the subjects (4/24, 17%) had moderate or severe injuries.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text